topnav

Home Issues & Campaigns Agency Members Community News Contact Us

Community News

Open dialogue among community members is an important part of successful advocacy. Take Action California believes that the more information and discussion we have about what's important to us, the more empowered we all are to make change.

Showing posts with label gas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gas. Show all posts

Thursday, July 23, 2015

Omnitrans Agrees to Remove Potentially Explosive Gas Tanks from Westside Residential Neighborhood

Two 30,000 gallon tanks like the one above were moved into the residential neighborhood several years ago. 

Finally they will be moved them out!

At the July 8, 2015, Inland Valley Environmental Justice Task Force meeting, hosted by the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice, Omnitrans’ CEO/ General Manager, Scott Graham, announced that the San Bernardino Transit Agency will remove the two 30,000 gallon tanks of Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) from its facility at 1700 West 5th Street in San Bernardino. The massive tanks of potentially explosive natural gas have long been a point of contention with the local residents who were concerned about the storage of natural gas in a residential neighborhood and next to an elementary school. Mr. Graham explained that over the next year they will convert the facility to utilize a pipeline, eliminating the need for the massive storage tanks. Estimates for completing the transition is June of 2015, Mr. Graham reported.

“We applaud, Omnitrans’ action to remove the tanks”, said Teresa Flores Lopez, longtime residents of the Westside and avid critic of the fueling operation. “We are very pleased that Omnitrans has finally listened and responded to our concerns.”

“While we acknowledge that the facility meets all its requirements, we remained concerned about the possibility of an accident” said Ericka Flores, community organizer for the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice and local resident. “ No one plans for an accident to happen but they still do. If a problem occurs with 60,000 gallons of natural gas, it should be in a place where there are few people, not in a residential area with a school across the street.”

Over the last year, natural gas has been gaining use as coal and other fuel use is reduced. As a result more and more reports of explosions and fires have taken place around the country. Residents were concerned that with the storage of such a large amount of gas in one place so close to homes and schools that an accident would result in destruction of homes and many injuries and death.

For nearly two decades the presence of natural gas tanks in the neighborhood has raised concerns. In 1998 residents started complaining about continuing leaks as indicated by the natural gas odors during fueling activities at the facility. Residents filed complaints to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) under it’s odor nuisance rules each time they smelled the gas. To address those concerns Omnitrans replaced the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) tanks with two massive tanks containing 30,000 gallons each of LNG and removed the odorant, methylmercaptan, which is used to warn of any gas releases. Just this year there were two incidences near the facility, one that require evacuation of the employees at the facility. Residents were concerned when they were not notified and neither were staff at the Ramona Alessandro Elementary School. The Board of Education for the San Bernardino City Unified School District joined in calling for the removal of the tanks in a resolution issued approved last year.

“We look forward to working with Omnitrans during this transition period”, said Penny Newman, Executive Director of CCAEJ who has been working with the community to solve this issue. Members of the EJ Task Force, a multi-agency task force made up of U.S. EPA, Calif. Air Resources Board (ARB); Dept. of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC); California Attorney General’s office; South Coast AQMD; local CUPA and others, have monitored activity of the facility in the last two years and even conducted their own analysis. Using a program called ALOHA, used by emergency response agencies to determine areas that would be impacted they developed a map showing the “Zone of Harm”. The analysis calculated that a population of 1,739 people and 447 dwellings would be affected in a 0.3 miles radius around the facility. The analysis did not take into account the presence of the elementary school, expanding the affected population by hundreds of children.

A recent report conducted for Omnitrans stated, “The facility’s tanks and its operation are state-of-the-art. Explosions are still possible, but extremely unlikely.” It goes on to state that if an explosion were to happen “the 95% potential injury scenarios may extend up to 880 feet from the facility boundary and 95% scenarios with the potential for severe injury may extend up to 175 feet from the facility boundary. “ “That’s our homes and our children”, Teresa Flores Lopez points out!

Carlin Hafitz, Environmental Justice Coordinator for the Southern Regional office of EPA, offered to work with Omnitrans in developing an appropriate emergency notification program for both residents and the school district in case of an incidence.


Via: Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice
http://www.ccaej.org/

Monday, April 28, 2014

California Senate Committee Stands up to Big Oil, Passes SB 1017


 The California State Senate Committee on Education stood up to the big money of Big Oil and took a step forward in the fight to end California’s status as the only oil and gas producing state in the nation to not tax the extraction of energy resources. SB 1017 could raise more than 2 billion dollars for California’s underfunded public universities and community colleges, devastated health and human services programs, and state parks.

Check out www.BigOilBeacon.com to see how Big Oil tries to buy big influence in Sacramento. Let’s end Big Oil’s free ride by passing SB 1017!

via: http://www.california-partnership.org/2014/04/24/california-senate-committee-stands-up-to-big-oil-passes-sb-1017/

Monday, November 18, 2013

California releases proposed fracking regulations

California got its first glimpse Friday morning of proposed hydraulic fracturing regulations that will likely be heavily debated over the coming year.

In a conference call with reporters, California Department of Conservation Director Mark Nechodom heralded a proposal he said would strike a balance between strong safeguards and ensuring that California's oil and gas industry can "remain productive and competitive."

The release of the draft rules kicks off a yearlong process, with the goal of having final regulations in place by Jan. 1, 2015. Nechodom said he anticipates "a very active public regulation" process that could yield "substantial changes" to the current proposed language.
Hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as fracking, involves blasting a pressurized cocktail of chemicals and water underground to dislodge the gas trapped in rock formations. While many have praised fracking as a way to wean America off of foreign oil, environmentalists warn that fracking represents a public health hazard.

Pointing to fracking booms in other parts of the country and warning of a potential explosion of activity above California's Monterey Shale, several lawmakers introduced fracking bills in 2013. Of those, only Sen. Fran Pavley's bill received the governor's signature, with more stringent measures that included statewide moratoriums falling by the wayside.

The Pavley law will now guide the regulatory process. The draft rules released on Friday will require well operators to notify people living near new wells, create a groundwater monitoring regime, spur a statewide scientific review of fracking and mandate disclosure of the types and concentrations of chemicals used in fracking.

Despite the chemical disclosure requirement, the new law allows companies to invoke trade secret protections in some cases. Nechodom said it remains unclear how broadly that exemption will be used.

"It's hard to tell at this point how many trade secret claims may be made," Nechodom said. "There may be few or there may be many."

In the intervening year before final regulations take effect, well operators will need to certify to regulators in advance that they are in compliance. Starting in 2015, they will need to go through a specific permitting process that could trigger environmental review.

Nechodom tried to rebuff concerns that well operators will have free reign in the gap year, saying that operators will still have to win California Environmental Quality Act approval via county-level applications for conditional use permits.

"That has been a misperception, that CEQA does not apply in 2014," Nechodom said, adding that "by the time we get to 2015 that permitting event will essentially require some CEQA review."

In the final days of the 2013 legislative session, environmental groups abandoned Pavley's bill en masse, with many saying that a provision of the bill allowing for broad reviews that cover multiple wells would weaken oversight. Regulations governing the grouping of permits were not released Friday.

But Tim Kustic, state oil and gas supervisor for the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources, said during Friday's conference call that the division already has to be selective in the reviews it conducts.

"We have to prioritize," Kustic said, adding that "fields that have extensive hydraulic fracturing and they're doing, say, the 3,000th in the field" will be a lower priority than an initial exploratory well.

"It's unrealistic to think the division will be out there for every well stimulation," Kustic said.

PHOTO: In this March 29, 2013 file photo, workers tend to a well head during a hydraulic fracturing operation at an Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. gas well outside Rifle, in western Colorado. AP/ Brennan Linsley.

via http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2013/11/california-fracking-regulations.html