topnav

Home Issues & Campaigns Agency Members Community News Contact Us

Community News

Open dialogue among community members is an important part of successful advocacy. Take Action California believes that the more information and discussion we have about what's important to us, the more empowered we all are to make change.

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Urge that the Senate Rules Committee recommend to the California Senate the confirmation of Michel Florio, Mark Ferron, Catherine Sandoval

Please join us in recruiting organizations in your regions to email 3 letters of support to the Senate Rules Committee by January 11— one each to support the confirmations of Catherine Sandoval, Michel Florio, and Mark Ferron to the California Public Utilities Commission.  The more letters received by the Senate Rules Committee, the stronger the case to confirm the three candidates at the Senate Rules Committee hearing, likely to be scheduled for January 18.

Together, the 3 Brown appointees provide a rare opportunity for a majority of the 5–member CPUC to be comprised of members who take seriously the CPUC mission to provide safe and reliable utility service at fair and reasonable prices.  During the past few months the new Commissioners have been responsible for several decisions in which the public interest has prevailed over industry interests, including opening an investigation of the AT&T/T-Mobile merger, rejecting a PG&E customer service charge, and compelling utilities to share with ratepayers the benefits of federal economic stimulus funding.  During the next few months, they will decide upon LifeLine affordability and expansion to wireless, profit rates guaranteed to utilities, and PG&E fines for the San Bruno explosion.

Commissioner Sandoval is a law professor specializing in telecommunications policy at Santa Clara University, and has served as a senior manager at the FCC.  She was born in East LA, becoming the first Latina in the U.S. to be awarded a Rhodes Scholarship and the first person of Latino descent to be appointed to the CPUC.  

Commissioner Florio developed his reputation as California's foremost consumer advocate during the 33 years (1978–2011) he worked as the senior energy attorney at TURN.  He was raised in the Midwest, became the first in his family to attend college and law school, and is possibly the most experienced person ever appointed to the CPUC.  

Commissioner Ferron has over two decades of banking and business experience from a European perspective that embraces the value of regulation as a balance to industry dominance.  He worked his way through school growing up in the Midwest by working in factories, and brings to the CPUC an expertise in financial markets with a sense of humanity.

Here are 3 sample letters of support for each of the 3 CPUC appointees up for confirmation. Please feel free to modify anything that you desire.

Letter 1
January 11, 2012

Honorable Darrell Steinberg
Chair, Senate Committee on Rules
California State Senate
State Capitol, Room 205
Sacramento, CA 95816

Dear President pro Tempore Steinberg,

I am pleased, on behalf of _____________________________, to submit this letter of enthusiastic support for the confirmation of Michel Florio as Commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission.  __________________ is a ______________________ organization that ________________________________.

Commissioner Florio offers a unique depth of experience and expertise that qualifies him to serve as an effective CPUC Commissioner.  His 33–year tenure from 1978 to 2011 as TURN Senior Energy Attorney provides him with an exceptional appreciation of how energy policies impact both the utility industry and everyday consumers.  His expertise on the challenges of maintaining a sustainable system of energy procurement, transmission, and distribution was honed when he served as a member of the Board of Governors of the California ISO from 1997 to 2005.  His reputation as a problem solver has been earned from years of bringing together consumers, utilities, and energy generators to seek common solutions that resulted in SB 695 reforms as well as broad–based settlements in key energy policy procurement issues.

Commissioner Florio brings a sensibility to the CPUC rooted in community and accomplishment.  He was raised in the Midwest as the son of a machine repairman who worked in a rock quarry.  He was the first in his family to not only receive a law degree, but to attend college at all.  It seems only fitting that he was appointed by Governor Brown as one of the most experienced regulatory experts to serve as CPUC Commissioner in its 100–year history.

The most important reason that we support the confirmation of Commissioner Florio is because he has demonstrated his leadership commitment to the CPUC mission of providing safe and reliable utility service at fair and reasonable prices.  While he has had to recuse himself from recent key votes pertaining to PG&E rate cases because of his previous participation as a consumer attorney in those cases, recent examples of his willingness to exercise independence from the CPUC leadership include:

1)      Commissioner Florio joined Commissioners Sandoval and Ferron in voting for an investigation of the impact on California ratepayers of the proposed AT&T/T–Mobile merger, and voted against President Peevey’s alternate proposal, which would not have analyzed the California-specific impacts of the merger.

2)      Commissioner Florio has taken the lead in expanding CPUC oversight of gas safety, requiring PG&E to conduct extensive pipeline inspections and document retrieval, and reversing the policy of not fining utilities for safety violations—resulting in a $36 million fine of PG&E for the deadly Rancho Cordova explosion.

We strongly urge that the Senate Rules Committee recommend to the California Senate the confirmation of Michel Florio as CPUC Commissioner because of his leadership experience, accomplishments, and willingness to defend the public interest to deliver the cleanest energy and best phone service at the lowest prices to consumers.

Sincerely,
(Your name)

----------------

Letter 2

January 11, 2012

Honorable Darrell Steinberg
Chair, Senate Committee on Rules
California State Senate
State Capitol, Room 205
Sacramento, CA 95816

Dear President pro Tempore Steinberg,

I am pleased, on behalf of _____________________________, to submit this letter of enthusiastic support for the confirmation of Catherine Sandoval as Commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission.  __________________ is a ______________________ organization that ________________________________.

Commissioner Sandoval offers a wide range of leadership experience and expertise that qualify her to serve as an effective CPUC Commissioner.  Her positions as a professor specializing in telecommunications law at Santa Clara University since 1994, and a senior manager at the FCC from 1994 to 1999, provide her with a research–based expertise in telecom policy issues.  Her expertise in energy policy issues was developed when she served as Undersecretary of the California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency from 2001 to 2004 and advised the Agency Secretary on energy matters when she served on the California ISO Board of Governors.

Commissioner Sandoval brings a sensibility to the CPUC rooted in community and accomplishment.  She was raised in East Los Angeles in a bilingual Spanish and English environment, and became the first person in her family to graduate from a four–year college.  She is the first Latina in the United States to be awarded a Rhodes Scholarship to study at Oxford University.  It seems only fitting that she was appointed by Governor Brown as the first person of Latino descent to serve as a Commissioner on the CPUC in its 100–year history.

The most important reason that we support the confirmation of Commissioner Sandoval is because she has demonstrated her leadership commitment to the CPUC mission of providing safe and reliable utility service at fair and reasonable prices by casting votes different from that of the CPUC leadership.  For instance:

1)      Commissioner Sandoval joined Commissioners Simon and Ferron in voting for a CPUC Judge’s Proposed Decision to deny a new PG&E $3 monthly customer service charge, saving most customers $1 billion over the next 3 years, compelling President Peevey to join the majority and withdraw his Alternate Decision to grant the customer service charge.

2)      Commissioner Sandoval joined Commissioners Florio and Ferron in voting for a thorough investigation of the impact on California ratepayers of the proposed AT&T/T–Mobile merger, and against President Peevey’s alternate proposal in which an expedited and more superficial investigation would have been conducted. 

We strongly urge that the Senate Rules Committee recommend to the California Senate the confirmation of Catherine Sandoval to Commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission because of her leadership experience, accomplishments, and willingness to defend the public interest to deliver the cleanest energy and best phone service at the lowest prices to consumers.

Sincerely,

(your name)
----------------

Letter 3

January 11, 2012

Honorable Darrell Steinberg
Chair, Senate Committee on Rules
California State Senate
State Capitol, Room 205
Sacramento, CA 95816

Dear President pro Tempore Steinberg,

I am pleased, on behalf of _____________________________, to submit this letter of enthusiastic support for the confirmation of Mark Ferron as Commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission.  __________________ is a ______________________ organization that ________________________________.

Commissioner Ferron offers a wide range of leadership experience and expertise that qualify him to serve as an effective CPUC Commissioner.  His 24 years of service as an international banker provides him with the experience necessary to evaluate the costs and risks associate with running a business that delivers safe and reliable utility service.  For the past two years, he has supported the role of nonprofits in advancing positive policy reforms through his involvement with Silicon Valley Social Ventures, a collaboration of 100 families who pool their resources to promote effective organizations. His two decades living in Europe has given him an appreciation of the positive effects of government regulation to provide a balance to unfettered markets.

Commissioner Ferron grew up in a small Midwestern town, worked his way through school by cleaning up in a metals-working factory, working grave-yard shifts at a 24/7 plastics factory and tutoring kids in Math.  He comes from a family of 5 kids, and now has 5 children of his own.  One of his chief motivations for getting involved in the work of the PUC is to try to hand over a decent environment for children who will live with the world we have created. It seems only fitting that Governor Brown has appointed him as a financial markets expert with a sense of humanity to serve as CPUC Commissioner.

The most important reason that we support the confirmation of Commissioner Ferron is because he has demonstrated his leadership commitment to the CPUC mission of providing safe and reliable utility service at fair and reasonable prices by his willingness to exercise independence from the CPUC leadership.  Two recent examples include:

1)      Commissioner Ferron joined Commissioners Sandoval and Simon in voting for a CPUC Judge’s Proposed Decision to deny a new PG&E $3 monthly customer service charge, saving most customers $1 billion over the next 3 years, compelling President Peevey to join the majority and withdraw his Alternate Decision to grant the customer service charge.

2)      Commissioner Ferron joined Commissioners Sandoval and Florio in voting for a thorough investigation of the impact on California ratepayers of the proposed AT&T/T–Mobile merger, and and against President Peevey’s alternate proposal in which an expedited and more superficial investigation would have been conducted.

We strongly urge that the Senate Rules Committee recommend to the California Senate the confirmation of Mark Ferron as CPUC Commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission because of his leadership experience, accomplishments, and willingness to defend the public interest to deliver the cleanest energy and best phone service at the lowest prices to consumers.

Sincerely,

(Your name)

Monday, January 9, 2012

Wells Fargo, king of private prisons, shut down for the day; seven arrested

by Adrienne Lauby
Santa Rosa, Calif. – On Dia de Reyes, the Day the Three Kings, a false king was exposed. Wells Fargo is the king of private prison finance, a king who shows no remorse as it forecloses on the houses and homes of its victims. But, on Friday afternoon, Jan. 6, two branches of Wells Fargo in Santa Rosa were closed for the day and seven people were arrested after they did civil disobedience inside the banks.
The protest, a collaboration between the immigrant rights community and the Occupy movement, drew 400-500 people for a march and rally. Their target, Wells Fargo, is the trustee of a fund that is heavily invested in two private prison corporations, Corrections Corporation of America and the GEO Group. These corporations own a majority of the detention centers that house undocumented immigrants across the U.S.
These same corporations helped draft the model for the Arizona anti-immigrant law, SB 1070, insuring a steady stream of immigrant prisoners for their private detention prisons. Because they contract with the U.S. government at a cost to taxpayers of $5.5 million a day, they profit from the misery of the immigrants and their community.
Okili Nguebari, originally from Congo, Africa, spoke at the rally about his experience in a private immigration prison. Three years ago he was picked up in front of his home by Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) and held for three months in an immigration detention facility owned by Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) in Eloy, Arizona.
In addition, the protestors challenged Wells Fargo’s practices around foreclosures and short sales of houses in Sonoma County. In only four years, foreclosures in the county have skyrocketed from 71 to 4,469 homes – nearly 4,450 families this year have lost their houses and all of their equity because banks and financiers manipulated the market.
Protestors unfurled a banner in the lobby of the main branch of Wells Fargo reading, “Homes Not Jails.” Then they read statements about the bank’s financing of private prisons and stories of people affected by deportations until they were arrested. Wells Fargo personnel detained at least two of the protestors in a citizen’s arrest.
“It was empowering to stand there and speak the truth,” Carolyn Epple said about her act of civil disobedience.
The protestors called on all Sonoma County residents to demand that Wells Fargo immediately divest from investments in immigrant prisons and declare a moratorium on foreclosures in Sonoma County. They also asked people to move their money from Wells Fargo into a local bank or credit union.
Jesus Guzman of the DREAM Alliance at Santa Rosa Junior College called the protest a “defining moment” for both the Occupy and Immigrant Rights movements.
“It’s about time,” he said and, judging by the cheers, the crowd agreed.
The coalition included the Graton Day Labor Center, the DREAM Alliance of Sonoma County, MEChA of Santa Rosa Junior College, the Committee for Immigrant Rights of Sonoma County, as well as Occupy groups from around the county. An Occupy Petaluma contingent rode bicycles to the rally.
The energetic and colorful march included a contingent wearing bright orange jumpsuits representing immigration detainees and the Hubbub Club Marching Band. A troupe of Aztec dancers led the march.
Adrienne Lauby is a Bay Area-based writer and a programmer at KPFA Radio 94.1FM. She can be reached atadrienne@sonic.net.
Editor’s note: Private prisons that Wells Fargo invests in also house thousands of California prisoners moved out of state prisons in response to a federal court order to reduce overcrowding.

Friday, January 6, 2012

BUDGET: Brown wants cuts, higher taxes

via Press Enterprise

BY JIM MILLER
SACRAMENTO BUREAU


SACRAMENTO — Programs for the poor and sick take the brunt of $4.2billion in spending cuts proposed Thursday by Gov. Jerry Brown in a budget that hinges on voters approving higher taxes this fall.

Another $5.4 billion in reductions would be imposed if voters reject Brown’s planned November ballot measure to temporarily increase the sales tax and raise income taxes on the wealthy. School funding would be slashed by more than $4.8billion, equivalent to cutting the school year by three weeks.

“This is not nice stuff, but that’s what it takes to balance the budget, and that’s assuming we get our tax revenues,” Brown told reporters at the Capitol, calling on lawmakers to act on some of the cuts by March.
2012-13 state budget
The $94.3 billion general fund plan closes an estimated $9.2 billion shortfall through June 2013. That is significantly less than a nearly $13billion gap projected in November by the Legislature’s nonpartisan fiscal analyst. Brown said his plan will help end the chronic shortfalls once and for all.

“We've cut the structural deficit substantially, and we now have the possibility of eliminating over the next couple of years the deficits that have plagued California,” Brown said. He spoke at a hastily called news conference after aides mistakenly posted the budget on the Internet, five days before its scheduled release.

Brown’s proposal changes the state’s welfare-to-work program known as CalWORKS. People who do not meet federal requirements of looking for work could be dropped from the program after two years, down from four. The plan reduces child aid for people in CalWORKS from $463 to $392 monthly.

In addition, the number of state child care slots for low-income working families would be reduced from 363,400 to 292,900. In-home assistance for the infirm and elderly also would be cut.
“How can the governor be cutting time limits and assistance for poor families to go to work when we have 11 percent unemployment and people cannot find jobs?” said Mike Herald of the Western Center on Law and Poverty.

Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, said his house will wait before considering the cuts sought by Brown. The state’s revenue picture seems to be improving, he said.
“If that trend continues even slightly, we may avoid the need to make the kinds of cuts the governor now suggests,” Steinberg said.

INLAND IMPACT
Inland welfare officials reacted warily to the governor’s proposal.

“The initial concept is good, but it is a question of how are they achieving the savings of $1 billion?” said Susan Loew, director of public social services for Riverside County. “And how will that impact the customers we are serving today?”

Between 11,000 and 12,000 families are enrolled in CalWORKS in Riverside County.
“The way the grants have been cut continuously over the last few years, many families are struggling,” she said. “This is the safety net. There is nothing below this.”

San Bernardino County served 51,163 people in the CalWORKS program in June, according to the county’s annual social services report.

That number has increased because of the economic recession, officials said. Further funding challenges will only decrease services as more people seek help, said Kevin Mahany, director of advocacy services at St. Mary Medical Center in Apple Valley.

“What we are seeing is people who are for the very first time having to go to the food bank or the homeless shelter or the welfare office,” Mahany said.

In Riverside County, about 18,000 people participate in the In-Home Supportive Services program. About 13,000 of those would be affected by the governor’s plan to reduce services for recipients who live with someone else. In San Bernardino County, the corresponding numbers are 20,500 and 14,300, respectively, according to the California Association of Public Authorities.

SCHOOLS EYE BALLOT
Brown has proposed a November ballot initiative that would raise the income tax on those making $250,000 or more a year and increase the state sales tax by a half cent. The higher taxes would raise about $7 billion a year and expire in 2017.

Inland school officials welcomed the prospect of more K-12 revenue after several years of reduced or frozen funding.

Yet districts would have to tear up their budgets midyear if Brown’s tax measure fails at the ballot box.

“Local school districts must again build and adopt their budgets based on uncertain state revenue estimates — and again without the legal ability to reduce their costs midyear if needed,” said Riverside County Superintendent of Schools Kenneth M. Young. “This is a very poor way of dealing with the state’s continuing budget crisis.”

Mike Fine, deputy superintendent for business services in Riverside Unified School District, said shortening the year would require additional legislation as well as negotiations with teachers and school employees unions.

“I believe the governor’s trying to do the right thing,” Fine said.

But schools’ options are limited, he said. “Our class sizes are already at the maximum. Our staff has been cut to the bone.”

Murrieta Valley Unified School District Superintendent Stan Scheer said the district already faces an $11 million shortfall in 2012-13. “We don’t have any wiggle room if this thing doesn’t pass,” he said of the governor’s tax measure.

Similarly, the San Bernardino County superintendent of schools office is advising districts to have a backup plan in case voters reject the tax increases.

“There’s no way districts can make that kind of cuts once the school year is under way,” said Ted Alejandre, assistant superintendent in the county office. “The advice we’re giving districts is to have contingency plans in place.”

Assemblyman Kevin Jeffries, R-Lake Elsinore, said he liked parts of the governor’s plan. But he criticized what he called the governor’s “tax and hammer” approach.

“He is effectively saying to the taxpayers that we are going to continue spending more than we take in — so you either give me more of your money or I’m going to cut what you cherish most,” Jeffries said.

Contributing to this report: Staff writers Dug Begley, dbegley@pe.com; Dayna Straehley, dstraehley@pe.com; and Michelle L. Klampe, mklampe@pe.com. Also contributing: The Associated Press.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Important Message On Behalf of All of Us or None

Greetings Everyone,

Dorsey Nunn (co-founder of All of Us or None) has requested that to all those concern with the contents of his email, please make the phone calls as requested.  Thanks for your time and consideration.

Dear Family, Friends, Allies, Associates and Comrades,

This not the end or the beginning of the year request for money but a request for your assistance in pursuing justice. I am asking that you make two telephone calls and to forward this email to your list that could help to save numerous lives. During the course of my vacation and the last several days of the year I was contacted by a number of family members whose loved ones are incarcerated in Tutwiler, Mississippi. They informed me that there has been a race riot in this southern prison (Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility) where some California prisoners are housed.  Days ago the Tallahatchie County Jail exploded in violence. This is one of those private prisons where the primary purpose is to save this state money and to secure a profit for a private prison corporation. Prisoners’ safety and rehabilitation comes second to pursuit of the all mighty dollar. I have been informed that it took over two hours to regain control of the environment and to end the misplace violence but the frustration remain extremely high during this current lock down.

A couple of family members have informed me that there were not enough guards to quell the violence. I couldn’t bring myself to argue that what gave rise to the problem was too many prisoners, mass incarceration and control being exercised through divide and conquer. Somehow when you are talking to concerned family members it is difficult to always make the correct political argument. However, I think it is extremely important that we pay attention to the unique set of circumstances that could confront members of our community who are incarcerated hundreds and thousands of miles from home; especially when the basis of their incarceration is to generate jobs and money for other people.

I started to write this email on New Year Eve but didn’t want to end the year thinking about another year where I have not figured out how to stop the beast (torturous mass incarceration). As the year ended I narrowed my New Year to a simple wish. I wished that I lived in a world where society thought everyone was entitled to public safety, even those under the absolute control of the state and private corporations.

I am writing to ask you to call the heads of this corporate prison (Bobby Phillips or Kenneth Little) and let them know that every human being has the right to safety. You can contact them at (662) 345-6567.

I am also asking you to call Matthew Cates, the head of the California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation and let him know that he is still responsible for the California prisoners housed outside of the state. Ask him what he has in place to insure the safety of prisoners being housed out of state. You can contact him at (916) 323-6001.


In Hot Pursuit of Justice,


Dorsey E. Nunn

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

How much does it cost to incarcerate an inmate?

via http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/laomenus/sections/crim_justice/6_cj_inmatecost.aspx?catid=3

California’s Annual Costs to Incarcerate an
Inmate in Prison


2008-09

Type of Expenditure
Per Inmate Costs

Security
$19,663

Inmate Health Care
$12,442

Medical care
$8,768

Psychiatric services
1,928

Pharmaceuticals
998

Dental care
748

Operations
$7,214

Facility operations (maintenance, utilities, etc.)
$4,503

Classification services
1,773

Maintenance of inmate records
660

Reception, testing, assignment
261

Transportation
18


Administration
$3,493

Inmate Support
$2,562

Food
$1,475

Inmate activities
439

Inmate employment and canteen
407

Clothing
171

Religious activities
70

Rehabilitation Programs
$1,612

Academic education
$944

Vocational training
354

Substance abuse programs
313

Miscellaneous
$116

Total
$47,102

It costs an average of about $47,000 per year to incarcerate an inmate in prison in California.
Over two-thirds of these costs are for security and inmate health care.
Since 2000-01, the average annual cost has increased by about $19,500. This includes an increase of $8,300 for inmate health care and $7,100 for security.