topnav

Home Issues & Campaigns Agency Members Community News Contact Us

Community News

Open dialogue among community members is an important part of successful advocacy. Take Action California believes that the more information and discussion we have about what's important to us, the more empowered we all are to make change.

Showing posts with label budget. Show all posts
Showing posts with label budget. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 12, 2015

For first time in 15 years, California likely to avoid short-term borrowing from Wall Street

California can handle all of its cash flow needs in-house, State Controller Betty Yee said Monday, the first time since before the dot-com bust that that the state will make it through a fiscal year without turning to Wall Street for short-term loans to smooth the ebb-and-flow of tax revenue.
The state has used “revenue anticipation notes,” known as RANs, in every year since the 2000-01 fiscal year. After that, Silicon Valley billions gave way to shortfalls, and the state suffered chronic budget problems for much of the next decade, including a low point during the recession that hit in 2008.

Monday, Yee’s office reported that the $5.7 billion in state revenue last month was virtually identical to what lawmakers predicted in the June budget package. In addition, the state has “unused borrowable resources” in various special funds totaling $26.1 billion, about 11 percent more than anyone expected.

That is more than enough money to cover the state’s short-term cash needs when general fund spending temporarily exceeds revenue, Yee’s office said, without any need for RANs – and the interest expense that comes with using them.

Via: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article30659625.html





Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article30659625.html#storylink=cpy

Thursday, July 2, 2015

Suit Accuses L.A. Unified of Diverting Millions Meant for Needy Students

The Los Angeles Unified School District has illegally shortchanged high-needs students of millions of dollars meant for them under the state's new school finance system, a lawsuit filed Wednesday alleges.

The suit claims that improper accounting will cost those students more than $400 million by next June and up to $2 billion by 2020.

Under the state's landmark reform of its school funding system two years ago, districts receive more dollars for students who are low-income, learning English or in foster care. But districts are required to invest in increased or improved services for them.

At issue is $450 million in special education funds that L.A. Unified counted in 2013-14 as part of its existing spending on high-needs students -- a figure that helped set the amount of new required investments for them. The district has said it is only counting dollars spent on special education students who are also low-income, learning English or in foster care -- all told, 79% of them.

But John Affeldt of Public Advocates Inc., one of three organizations that filed the suit, said that money is being spent on special education needs -- not primarily to help students overcome learning challenges based on language, income or foster placement, as required by state law. He said L.A. Unified appears to be the only major school district in California counting special education funds in this way and that it has artifically inflated its current spending on needy students, lowering the additional amount that will be required.

"L.A. Unified is clearly violating the rules, and when L.A. violates rules the impact is felt in a very large way," Affeldt said. "That's undercutting the heart" of the law.

District officials said they were "disappointed" by the lawsuit, saying its allegations were based on a misinterpretation of the funding law.

"The Legislature clearly granted school districts -- which serve predominantly low-income students, foster youth and English language learners -- the highest degree of flexibility in determining student program needs," a district statement said. "We are confident that the District will be vindicated in this litigation. More importantly, we stand by our continuing commitment to serve our most disadvantaged students."

The plaintiffs, Community Coalition of South Los Angeles and Reyna Frias, a parent, are also suing Los Angeles County Supt. of Schools Arturo Delgado. In a letter last September, Delgado approved the district's accounting methods. County education officials declined to comment.

In addition to San Francisco-based Public Advocates, the lawsuit was also filed by the ACLU Foundation of Southern California and the Covington & Burling law firm of San Francisco. The lawsuit asks that L.A. Unified immediately recalculate its spending and increase funding for the targeted students.

"LAUSD is breaking its promise to provide my children and millions of other students in the future, with the services they need and the law says they should receive," Frias, mother of two students in district schools, said in a statement.

By: Teresa Watanabe
Via: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-lausd-funding-lawsuit-20150701-story.html

Monday, June 22, 2015

This time for real: Legislature passes (another) budget


Three days after Gov. Jerry Brown and legislative leaders reached agreement on a $115.4 billion general fund state spending plan, lawmakers in both houses on Friday ratified the deal.

The budget includes Brown’s more conservative revenue estimates and lower overall spending levels, while increasing funding for preschool and universities and expanding Medi-Cal coverage to undocumented children starting in May 2016.

Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León, D-Los Angeles, said the budget contained “unprecedented gains” in education and social services. The budget also won support from some Senate Republicans, while one Senate Democrat, Holly Mitchell, refused to vote on it. She said the budget did too little to help people living in poverty.

In the lower house, the bill passed almost entirely along party lines, with every Republican except for Rocky Chávez of Oceanside voting against it.

Democrats in the Legislature passed a more expansive spending plan on Monday, knowing Brown would not accept it but racing to meet a June 15 deadline or forfeit pay. They announced a budget agreement the following day on a more modest plan.

While Assemblywoman Melissa Melendez, R-Lake Elsinore, praised the revised budget bill for hewing to Brown's more conservative revenue estimates, she said it redirected education funding to other areas and failed to adequately fund transportation infrastructure or more judges, a major issue in her Riverside County district.

Lawmakers in both houses were continuing to debate a raft of budget-related trailer bills.

Via: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article24986815.html

Monday, May 18, 2015

Kevin de León joins immigrants to advocate for health care expansion

Health care for undocumented immigrants wasn’t part of Gov. Jerry Brown’s revised budget proposal last week, but that hasn’t slowed the campaign for SB 4. The proposal – a priority of legislative Democrats that currently sits in the Senate Appropriations Committee as lawmakers consider the expected annual cost of between $175 million and $740 million – tops the agenda for the 19th annual Immigrant Day. 


Immigrant rights advocates will be at the Capitol to lobby for SB 4, as well as AB 622, which would prohibit employers from using the federal E-Verify system to check the immigration status of current workers or applicants who have not yet received a job offer; AB 953, to expand limits on racial profiling; and a $20 million budget proposal to assist Californians applying for citizenship or deferred action.

The day will kick off at 9:15 a.m. with an interfaith ceremony on the west steps of the Capitol, followed by a rally at 9:45 a.m. featuring state Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León, Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, and Assemblyman Luis Alejo, D-Watsonville.

Via: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article21135027.html





Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article21135027.html#storylink=cpy

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Statewide Day of Action Budget Revise Press Conference & Rally

Join us May 14 & 15, 2015 for
Statewide Day of Action
Budget Revise Press Conference & Rally



Sacremento - May 14
State Capitol, South Steps
When: 11:00 am or
Following Budget Release
Contact: Pete Woiwode, 510-504-9552
pete@communitychange.org

Los Angeles - May 14
300 S. Spring Street, 90013
When: 12:00 pm
Contact: Aurora Garcia, 562-519-3106
agarcia@communitychange.org

San Jose - May 15
1381 S. First street, 95110
When: 10:00 am
Contact: Pete Woiwode, 510-504-9552
pete@communitychange.org

Riverside - May 15
3737 Main street, 92501
When: 1:00 pm
Contact: Maribel Nunez,  562-569-4051
mnunez@communitychange.org

Monday, January 12, 2015

A breakdown of the governor's budget

Here's a breakdown of Gov. Jerry Brown's proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1:

K-12, COMMUNITY COLLEGES: Would get $7.4 billion more this fiscal year and next. For next year, Brown proposes a 7.9 percent increase in school spending. K-12 per-pupil spending would grow by $306, to $9,667. Much of the infusion will pay off what the state already owes schools, part of the "wall of debt" that Brown pledged to dismantle.

UC AND CSU: The two state university systems would each receive a 4 percent increase -- $120 million each -- as long as they don't raise tuition.

SOCIAL SERVICES: The state will spend an extra $800 million on Medi-Cal because of a 2.1 percent increase in enrollment. Brown would also spend $483 million to eliminate a 7 percent cut to the hours of care In-Home Supportive Services recipients receive each month.

COURTS: Would receive about a $180 million boost, the second consecutive year the judiciary got a dose of good news after years of cutbacks in the hundreds of millions of dollars. The bulk of the increase is headed to the state's 58 trial courts, which will receive about $2.7 billion of the judiciary's $3.47 billion budget.

PRISONS: Spending on the California prison system would increase by 1.7 percent, raising the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to $10.1 billion. Prison reform groups expressed disappointment in the governor's decision to increase spending on incarceration.

TRANSPORTATION: The state Transportation Agency would get $15.8 billion. Brown has said he wants to fix California's crumbling roads, highways and bridges, but his budget proposal includes no plan for covering the $66 billion cost of those repairs.

PARKS AND ENVIRONMENT: Brown proposed spending $532 million on new water projects, funded by the Proposition 1 water bond approved by voters in November. Projects include recycled water, conservation and watershed improvement. The governor also proposed $20 million in new money for deferred maintenance at state parks; $1 billion from prior bonds to fund new flood-control projects; and $1 billion from the state's cap-and-trade program to fund high-speed rail, urban transit, building efficiency and other programs to reduce greenhouse gases.


via: http://www.mercurynews.com/education/ci_27292946/breakdown-governors-budget





Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Brown, Legislature study ways to avoid UC, Cal State tuition hikes


By MELANIE MASONPATRICK MCGREEVY AND LARRY GORDON

December 11, 2014

The fate of the proposed tuition increase at University of California campuses now rests in the hands of the governor and state lawmakers, who are aligned in opposition to it but divided over how to scrap it.
The UC regents voted in November to increase tuition by as much as 28% over the next five years, triggering student protests and a chorus of political bellowing, and promised to make higher education funding one of the Capitol's hottest policy debates in the coming year.

The leaders of the state Assembly and Senate have offered plans to defeat the proposed increase and raise government funding for California's public universities.

Brown, a member of the UC Board of Regents, has proposed an annual 4% increase in state funding for the 10 University of California campuses if the current three-year tuition freeze remains in place. He also is pressing the regents to consider cost-saving changes such as offering more online courses and consolidating academic programs that are now duplicated at multiple campuses. Administration officials said the governor will address UC's financial well-being in his budget, to be released in January, but offered no details.

UC President Janet Napolitano has expressed support for some plans offered by legislators and she said she is open to studying Brown's proposals. However, she has said that the governor's proposed 4% increase is not enough to pay UC's payroll and retirement costs or to cover its plans to hire more faculty and enroll 5,000 more California undergraduates over five years.

UC received $2.64 billion in state general fund revenue this year, $460 million less than seven years ago. More than 166,000 undergraduates attend the UC campuses, and tuition is currently about $12,200 for in-state students. Here's a breakdown of the proposal to increase tuition and the alternatives being offered:

The tuition increase

A 14-7 vote by the regents gave Napolitano the authority to raise tuition each year for the next five years, with the amount dependent on state funding. The annual increase could be as high as 5% — which by 2019 could add up to a cumulative 28% increase over the current tuition.

•A third of the money raised by the increase would go toward financial aid programs.

•By 2019-20, tuition could be as high as $15,564 a year if the state does not increase funding.

•The cost of a UC education — tuition, room and board, books and other expenses — currently can total $30,000 for state residents. Students from other states and countries pay a $23,000 premium in addition to tuition.

The Assembly proposal

Speaker Toni Atkins (D-San Diego) proposed an additional $50 million in state funding for the UC system to avoid tuition increases; the California State University colleges would get extra money as well.
The plan also would:

•Increase Cal Grant financial aid for lower-income families and require UC to maintain existing aid.

•Speed up the Middle Class Scholarship program to cut fees for qualifying families by more than 20% in the 2015-2016 school year.

•Increase UC enrollment of California students by 10,000 over five years and cap enrollment of out-of-state students at 2014-2015 levels.

•Increase the tuition premium for out-of-state students by $5,000, which would raise an additional $100 million annually.

Atkins also vowed to take a "zero-based" approach to crafting the UC budget next year. That would build the system's budget from zero, rather than from previous years' spending, and would mean scrutinizing each line item in the proposed plan. Assembly Republican Leader Kristin Olsen of Modesto supports the zero-based budgeting. Also, Assembly member Young Kim (R-Fullerton) has proposed legislation that would freeze tuition at the state's public colleges and universities as long as the temporary state tax increase under Proposition 30, approved by voters in 2012, remains in effect.

The Senate proposal

Democrats have offered a plan to eliminate the tuition increase, expand enrollment at the UC and Cal State systems and provide grants as incentives to Cal State students who stay on track to complete their degrees in four years. The plan was proposed by Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles).

It would cost the state $342 million next year, rising to $434 million. Money would come from taking $580 million over three years from the Middle Class Scholarship program, instituting a 17% increase in the premium charged to out-of-state students and siphoning $156 million from the general fund the first year, dropping to $66 million in the third year.

The plan would also:

•Increase UC enrollment by 5,000 students and Cal State enrollment by 10,500 students next year, at an additional total cost of $113 million per year.

•Provide $75 million each to UC and Cal State annually to pay for more courses and counseling services so students can graduate on time.

•Provide up to $4,500 in "completion incentive grants" to motivate Cal State students to carry a full load of at least 15 credits so that they can graduate in four years, rather than the current average of six years. Students would get a $1,000 grant for completing 30 units by the first year, an additional $1,500 for completing 60 units by the second year and an additional $2,000 for completing 90 units by the third year.

•Fund 7,500 additional Cal Grant competitive awards for older, nontraditional students.

•Repeal this year's scheduled 11% cut to Cal Grants for about 29,000 students attending private and nonprofit universities.

•Encourage corporations and individuals to invest in the College Access Tax Credit Fund, which provides $500 million in tax credits for charitable donations to the fund. The money would go to double funding of Cal Grant Access Awards for community college students.

•Phase out the Middle Class Scholarship program, which in its first year provided tuition credits for 73,000 students from families with incomes between $80,000 and $150,000. Current recipients would continue to get funds until they graduate, but no other students would be allowed into the program. The credits average $1,112 for those enrolled at UC and $628 at Cal State.

Neither the governor nor the California Legislature has the authority to force the UC regents to rescind the tuition increase. However, they do have power over state funding provided to the university system, giving them political leverage.


via: http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-pol-uc-tuition-explainer-20141211-story.html#page=1

Monday, June 23, 2014

Jerry Brown to sign budget Friday in San Diego

Gov. Jerry Brown will sign the state budget Friday in San Diego, his office announced Thursday, less than a week after both houses of the Legislature approved the spending plan.
Governors have the right to reduce or strike appropriations in budget bills before signing them, but it is unclear what line-item vetoes Brown will make to the $156.4 billion budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1. Last year, the Democratic governor made only a small number of line-item vetoes, totaling about $40 million.

This year's budget plan is a compromise between Brown and Democratic lawmakers. It includes an expansion of child care and preschool for poor children and more money for high-speed rail, Medi-Cal and welfare-to-work. It also puts about $1.6 billion into a special rainy-day account.

Brown will be joined for the budget signing by Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, and Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento. Brown is scheduled to travel to Los Angeles after signing the budget to attend a celebration with Latino lawmakers.

PHOTO: Gov. Jerry Brown signs bills in Sacramento on March 24, 2011 as Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, and Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco look on. The Sacramento Bee/Hector Amezcua




Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2014/06/jerry-brown-to-sign-budget-friday-in-san-diego.html#storylink=cpy

Friday, May 16, 2014

AM Alert: Health and human services budget committee discusses May Revision

Legislators are usually back in their districts on a Friday, but with Gov. Jerry Brown presenting hisrevised budget proposal this week, there's enough to discuss to keep some of them in town today. The Assembly Budget Committee's Subcommittee on Health and Human Services meets in Room 4202 of the Capitol at 9 a.m.

Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2014/05/am-alert-health-and-human-services-budget-committee-discusses-may-revision.html#storylink=cpy

Whether Brown has restored enough of the recession-era spending cuts to health programs and social services is one of the biggest points of contention surrounding the budget. With the first surplus in years, liberal lawmakers and advocacy groups have pushed the governor to spend the additional billions rather than socking them away in a proposed rainy-day fund. In-home caregivers have been especially vocal in pushing back against Brown's budget, which would limit the number of hours they can work.

Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2014/05/am-alert-health-and-human-services-budget-committee-discusses-may-revision.html#storylink=cpy

Monday, May 12, 2014

MAY 14TH STATEWIDE DAY OF ACTION

MAY 14TH STATEWIDE DAY OF ACTION

Press Conference and Rally about the Governor's May Revise Budget to highlight the need to invest in Californians and eradicate poverty!

When: Wednesday, May 14, 2014
Where: Rosa Parks State Building
464 West 4th Street, San Bernardino
Time: 12:00 noon


Friday, March 28, 2014

Assembly speaker says Cal State could get bigger funding boost

California Gov. Jerry Brown jokingly apologized to fellow California State University trustees Tuesday for making the same speech meeting after meeting: the system's request for additional funding competes with a long list of other priorities that outpace resources.

But Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez, also a Cal State trustee, dangled the prospect that the Legislature might be willing to consider more than the $142.2-million boost that the governor has proposed for the university system in his 2014-15 spending plan.

In November, Cal State had requested a budget increase of $237.6 million to enroll 20,000 more students and hire 500 additional full-time faculty, among other measures.

Pérez suggested that the university might make a convincing case for more than what Brown is offering but less than what the university wants.

"To the extent that you can inspire my colleagues to get to a number between his and yours, it would be helpful to understand the priorities of what you would do with the additional funding," said Pérez, making a rare appearance at the trustees' meeting in Long Beach. Brown has become a regular attendee.

Chancellor Timothy P. White seized the opportunity to recount the needs of a system, which, despite recent funding increases, is still struggling to recover from more than $1 billion in budget cuts during the recession.

Those cuts reduced faculty ranks, class offerings and student support programs, all of which hinder students' ability to graduate on time and ultimately enter the workforce.

"We're committed to redoubling our efforts to get more students to high-quality degrees sooner," White told Pérez. "That's really at the core of success for California's economic future and social mobility."

The governor countered that there continue to be "lots of interests, desires and claims" on state funding.

"It's challenging to grasp what is important and what is not so important," Brown said. "I like the academic world, I like reading about what academics do, but there's always a gap."

He also reiterated his continuing theme that technology, including online education, would ultimately yield savings for Cal State, the University of California and California community colleges.

"It's not going to happen soon and I don't know in what form, but I can imagine students googling English 101," Brown said.

Trustees also heard a proposal Tuesday to enact a systemwide $4 annual fee on students to support the California State Students Assn., which has been funded by campus dues and the chancellor's office.

Student fees have become controversial, with an increasing number of campuses enacting so-called student success fees to support faculty hiring, classroom improvements and instructional programs that critics contend should be confined to regular tuition.

Students from a number of campuses are expected to protest those charges at Wednesday's board meeting.

In this case, the fee would be voluntary and would help the student association provide a greater presence in Sacramento and Washington, provide more opportunities to engage students on campus and give the association greater independence from the chancellor's office, association President Sarah Couch said.

"This is about student investment and enhancing the student experience," said Couch, who's studying for a masters' degree in English literature at Sacramento State University.

The board is scheduled to vote on the fee at its May meeting.


http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-calstate-trustees-20140326,0,6813466.story#ixzz2x5QnGjd6

Thursday, February 20, 2014

California leaders propose drought relief funding plan

SACRAMENTO — Gov. Jerry Brown and legislative leaders unveiled a proposed $687.4-million drought-relief package Wednesday to free up water supplies and aid Californians facing financial ruin because of the state's prolonged dry spell.

The proposal would provide millions of dollars to clean up drinking water, improve conservation and make irrigation systems more efficient. It would increase penalties for those who illegally divert water.

The plan also contains money for emergency food and housing for those out of work because of the drought, including farmworkers, and to provide emergency drinking water to communities in need.

Under the legislation, which could be enacted within weeks, the State Water Resources Control Board would be directed to find ways to expand the use of recycled water and storm-water runoff.

Funds also would be available to replenish groundwater supplies, and for state and local agencies to clear brush in drought-stricken areas that pose a high fire risk.

Brown, appearing before reporters at the state's emergency operations center, said that unlike many problems in Sacramento, "this is not caused by partisan gridlock or ideology. It's caused by Mother Nature herself.

"We really don't know how bad the drought is going to be," Brown said.

Senate leader Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) said the intent was to provide drought relief as quickly as possible and avoid "the ideological vortex" that has bedeviled California water policy for decades.

The new package sidesteps a controversial proposal to replumb the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and is silent on a multibillion-dollar water bond measure scheduled for the November ballot.

"The idea is to do all that we can with the resources we have," Steinberg said.

California's highly charged water issues have also attracted attention in Washington, where House Republicans want to dismantle federal environmental regulations that they say take precious water supplies from California farmers.

Such a move is opposed by Democrats, including President Obama.

The president, during a tour of parched San Joaquin Valley croplands last week, raised the GOP's ire by tying California's drought to global warming.

He said that unless carbon pollution is curbed, such dry spells will grow more severe.
The president pledged $160 million in federal assistance to farmers, cattle ranchers and others hurt by dry conditions.

No partisan divide is expected to impede the new drought legislation in Sacramento, where Democrats hold a supermajority in the Assembly and Senate and could approve the package without Republican support.

Still, passage is not assured: When it comes to water, Californians are split more by geography than by political allegiance.

The Democratic proposal announced Wednesday would pump money into long-term programs as well as provide immediate drought relief to growers and to communities at risk of running out of drinking supplies.

The strategy drew mixed reactions.

Tim Quinn, executive director of the Assn. of California Water Agencies, called the legislation "a bold move by the governor" that would help protect the state against future droughts by funding local projects "that can make a difference soon."

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times

via: http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-drought-20140219,0,2302688.story#axzz2tn6ucBnZ

Friday, February 7, 2014

California Republicans seek to redirect high-speed rail dollars

Saying California has betrayed the will of voters who approved a controversial high-speed rail project, Assembly Republicans on Thursday proposed giving those voters a redo.


"It's clear that the current high-speed rail project hardly resembles what the voters narrowly approved," said Assembly Republican Leader Connie Conway of Tulare.

Under the plan announced by a group of Republicans, voters would be able to decide whether to channel $8.5 billion in bond money, endorsed by voters via a 2008 ballot initiative, towards local transportation infrastucture projects.

The plan reflects both Republican ire over Gov. Jerry Brown's embattled project and the train's tenuous financial position. A Sacramento Superior Court judge in November ordered the Brown administration to tear up its funding plan, saying it had strayed from the terms of Proposition 1A, which authorized the bond issue back in 2008.

The Brown administration has since prevailed upon the California Supreme Court, and the high court ordered the case to be sent back to a lower court for an expedited review.

In addition to redirecting the high-speed rail money, the Republican package of four bills would dedicate up to $2.5 billion of a newfound state surplus to paying off transportation loans; ensure billions in fuel tax money flows annually into local infrastructure projects, per the terms of Proposition 42; and compel the state to repay $2.5 billion in gasoline tax revenue diverted elsewhere during lean budget years.


PHOTO: Assemblywoman Connie Conway, joined by fellow Republicans, unveils the caucus' transportation package in the State Capitol on February 6, 2014. The Sacramento Bee/Jeremy B. White.


via: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2014/02/california-republicans-seek-to-redirect-high-speed-rail-dollars.html

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Statewide Day of Action

Join us this Friday, January 10th 
for our 
Statewide Day of Action

Choose a location nearest you and let your voice be heard!

San Francisco
Where: 350 McAllister Street
When: 12:00 pm
Contact: Pete Woiwode
(510) 504-9552
pete@communitychange.org

Sacramento
Where: Capitol Room TBD
When: 11:00 am or following
Governor Brown's statement
Contact: Pete Woiwode
(510) 504-9552
pete@communitychange.org

San Jose
Where: 200 E. Santa Clara St.
When: 10:00 am
Contact: Pete Woiwode
(510) 504-9552
pete@communitychange.org

Bakersfield
Where: Liberty Bell at 
1415 Truxton Ave., 93301
When: 12:00 pm
Contact: Paola Fernandez
(661) 378-7290
pfernandez@communitychange.org

Los Angeles
Where: State Building at
300 S. Spring Street, 90013
When: 12:00 pm
Contact: Astrid Campos
(714) 396-8242
acampos@communitychange.org

Riverside
Where: California Towers at
3737 Main Street, 92501
When: 11:30 am
Contact: Maribel Nunez
(562) 569-4051
mnunez@communitychange.org


Wednesday, December 18, 2013

This Chart Blows Up the Myth of the Welfare Queen

The Bureau of Labor Statistics shows us the frugal reality of life on the social safety net. 

Here's a useful graph to keep handy for the next time Fox News airs a report about food stamp users buying lobster with their benefits.

This month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics compared yearly spending between families that use public assistance programs, such as food stamps and Medicaid, and families that don't. And surprise, surprise, households that rely on the safety net lead some pretty frugal lifestyles. On average, they spend $30,582 in a year, compared to $66,525 for families not on public assistance. Meanwhile, they spend a third less on food, half as much on housing, and 60 percent less on entertainment.


These figures, drawn from the 2011 Consumer Expenditure Survey, don't capture all non-cash perks some low-income families get from the government, such as healthcare coverage through Medicaid. But they give you a sense of the kind of tight finances these families deal with.

Take the food budget: There were, on average, 3.7 people in each family on public assistance (I know, that sounds weird, but bear with me). So that $6,460 spent on food comes out to about $34 per person, per week. Not exactly a shellfish budget. 

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Jerry Brown calls for federal unemployment funding extension

With Congress apparently close to a budget agreement that does not include an extension of federal unemployment insurance benefits, Gov. Jerry Brown urged House and Senate leaders to reconsider.

"When these benefits were first authorized, the national unemployment rate was only 5.6 percent," Brown said in a letter Thursday. "The national rate is still 7 percent and 36 states, including California, have even higher unemployment rates than when the extension benefits were originally authorized."

Brown's letter comes as the Senate prepares to act this week on a bill that would avert a government shutdown next year. The bill does not include an extension of unemployment benefits scheduled to expire at the end of the month, frustrating many Democrats.

Brown said more than 214,000 Californians are currently collecting federal unemployment extension benefits and that they "will suffer irreparable harm if these federal benefits are allowed to expire."

Brown also complained more broadly about what he called "the severe federal underfunding" of California's unemployment insurance program, where mistakes in a computer upgrade delayed benefits for thousands of unemployed Californians this fall.

"In 2013, California's federal UI administrative grant was $128 million less than what was needed to pay benefits timely and accurately," Brown wrote. "The continuous funding shortfalls result in benefit delays and prevent the state from providing timely and accurate UI services to unemployed workers suffering a financial hardship."

PHOTO: Gov. Jerry Brown speaks at an event in Oakland on Nov. 1, 2013. Associated Press/Marcio Jose Sanchez

Thursday, November 21, 2013

California fiscal analyst projects large surpluses

California's budget is on track for multibillion dollar surpluses in the coming years, the Legislature's nonpartisan fiscal analyst said Wednesday in an upbeat assessment of the state's fiscal picture.

An improving economy and continuing revenue from voter-approved tax increases in 2012 have left state finances in strong shape, Legislative Analyst Mac Taylor wrote in his office's five-year fiscal outlook released this morning.

The state is projected to have a $5.6 billion reserve by June 2015. Taylor, though, offered a note of caution in the report, the second-straight rosy review of state finances after years of red-ink warnings.

"Despite the large surplus that we project over the forecast period, the state's continued fiscal recovery is dependent on a number of assumptions that may not come to pass," he wrote.

Taylor projected annual surpluses to grow more slowly after the 2016-17 budget year, as tax increases from Proposition 30, Gov. Jerry Brown's ballot initiative last year to raise taxes, phase out. The impact will be felt over several years, however, and Taylor told reporters "you don't have one really dramatic year in which revenues fall off."

The revenue forecast remains highly dependent on capital gains. Taylor said the market "is not out of line like it was in the dot com boom."

Brown has taken steps in recent weeks to temper spending expectations ahead of the release of his annual spending plan in January, and his administration continued to urge caution Wednesday.

"Recent history reminds us painfully of what happens when the state makes ongoing spending commitments based on what turn out to be one-time spikes in capital gains," Michael Cohen, Brown's director of finance, said in a prepared statement. "We're pleased that the analyst's report shares the governor's view that discipline remains the right course of action. The focus must continue to be on paying down the state's accumulated budgetary debt and maintaining a prudent reserve to ensure that we do not return to the days of $26 billion deficits."




Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2013/11/california-fiscal-analyst-projects-large-surpluses.html#storylink=cpy




Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2013/11/california-fiscal-analyst-projects-large-surpluses.html#storylink=cpy

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Stop Prison Spending and Reinvest in our Communities: Take Action Now!







Today, the Governor and Legislative leaders announced a "compromise deal" to address the court order to reduce prison crowding. They've given the Court an ultimatum: either extend the deadline or we will expand the prison system.

The Assembly will be voting on the plan this Wednesday, and we need our voices to be louder than ever: California does not need any prison expansion. Reduce the prison population and restore the cuts now.  

We are having a big impact. Our pressure forced Brown to agree to add millions in investments to rehabilitation and diversion if the Court deadline is extended. But as it stands, this bill will delay any real reductions to the prison population. And unless we cancel the state's plans to build 3 new prisons will mean an expansion of the prison system. We need to demand that the administration prioritize the prison population reduction strategies we know will work today.

All of our events statewide are still happening so please join us in the streets at an action near you:


  Sacramento: Tuesday - September 10 - Press Conference at 11:00am at the North Steps, Capital Building, followed by legislative visits. Please contact emily@curbprisonspending for more information.

  Los Angeles: Tuesday - September 10 - Preschool Not Prisons Press Conference & Rally at 9:30am at Twin Towers Jail, 450 Bauchet. Please contact info@raisingcaliforniatogether.org for more information.

  Los Angeles: Tuesday - September 10 - Virtual Townhall at 6:00pm – 8:00pm at Community Coalition and Homeboy Industries. Please contact Karren Lane at karren@cocosouthla.org for more information.

Los Angeles: Wednesday - September 11 - Press Conference at 10:30am – 12:00pm at the Ronald Reagan State Building, 300 South Spring Street. RSVP on Facebook. Please contact diana@curbprisonspending.org for more information.

  Los Angeles: Saturday - September 14 - Free Our Sisters: Community Solutions, Not Jail Construction at 2pm at Art Share LA, 801 E. 4th Place. Please contact diana@curbprisonspending.org for more information.


Friday, June 28, 2013

Gov. Jerry Brown signs on-time budget into law

Gov. Jerry Brown's signing of the state budget Thursday was a sharp contrast from the grim visages and rueful statements that came with the past decade's spending plans.
Instead, Brown and legislative leaders wore big smiles and proclaimed a new era of fiscal stability and aid for struggling Californians as the governor signed the $96.3 billion spending document into law at the State Capitol.
"It is a big day for school kids, it is a big day for Californians who don't have health care or don't have adequate health care," Brown said, claiming other states are studying California's plan enviously to see how it was accomplished.
Most new revenues -- driven by the Proposition 30 income- and sales-tax hike that voters approved in November, plus a resurgent economy -- will go to K-12 education, which is always the general fund budget's largest section. This budget dedicates 41 percent of its funding to public schools, and every district will get more money to spend per pupil, while disadvantaged students will get even more funding.
But the budget also starts restoring some of the deep cuts made in recent years, with funding for dental care for the poor, child-care subsidies for working families and beleaguered trial courts. Meanwhile, it creates a $1.1 billion reserve and makes small payments toward the state's $27 billion "wall of debt."
The governor acknowledged California still has sizable long-term liabilities -- most notably its public employee pension funds -- but said that for the first time in years it has a balanced, on-time budget that addresses Californians' needs while remaining fiscally responsible. He used his line-item veto power to pare about $40 million, spread across a long list of programs, from the Legislature's plan.
State Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg said "budgets represent signposts of great progress or difficult times," and this one is the former: "Real people, hurt for so long, will get some help."
The biggest noneducation budget increase this year is for mental health services, he noted. "Thousands of people will benefit as a result, no more desperate family members having to see their loved ones in emergency rooms or in jails or on the streets."
Assembly Speaker John Perez, D-Los Angeles, said the budget "builds on the progress we've made over the last couple of years; he added that he's proud that California is creating jobs at a faster rate than any other state.
"It is a budget that says the fiscal health of the state is on the mend ... but also that we're committed to the health and well-being of all of the people who live in California," Perez said.
Among Perez's and fellow Democrats' biggest wins in this budget are middle-class scholarships, which will kick in for eligible Cal-State University and University of California students in the 2014-15 school year. When fully effective in 2017-18, they'll cover 10 percent of tuition and fees for families earning between $125,000 and $150,000; 25 percent for those earning less than $125,000; and 40 percent for those with a family income of $100,000 or less. CSU alone estimates 150,000 students may qualify.
Brown also Thursday signed a separate bill to expand Medi-
Cal eligibility to more than 1 million low-income people and streamline the program's eligibility and enrollment rules -- a key part of implanting the federal Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare.
The state Senate approved the main budget bill 28-10 while the Assembly passed it 54-25 two weeks ago, with Republicans in both houses opposed.
Senate Republican Leader Bob Huff, R-Brea, said the budget "includes some positive steps forward in education funding and reform, but it does not keep the campaign promises made to Californians that all the money from the Proposition 30 tax increases would go to fund schools." He said he's also disappointed that the budget doesn't pay down enough debt or address the state's huge pension liabilities.
"Keeping promises to the people of California on education funding and paying off our state debt load so as not to burden future generations with our mistakes should have been the first priority, but unfortunately that did not happen," he said.
California Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye said she's "both pleased and concerned." On one hand, it's the first time in five years that the judicial branch hasn't taken more cuts, "the first step in the long road to restoring funding."
"On the other hand, we have a long way to go. In the last several years, about $1 billion in general fund support has been taken from the judicial branch," she said. "And we are out of one-time solutions and funding transfers to blunt the impact of such massive budget reductions in the future."
The extra $63 million in this year's budget may not be enough to reopen closed courts, bring back laid-off workers or stop furloughs, she said, "and it absolutely won't be enough to provide the kind of access to justice the public deserves."