Senator Carol Liu
Principal Co-Author Assemblymember Lowenthal
Co-authors Senators Leno, Hancock, Negrete McLeod, and Pavley, and Assemblymembers Beall, SaldaƱa, Evans, Skinner, and Yamada
Alternative Custody for Female Offenders
The Problem
While over half of the men in prison were incarcerated for violent crimes, just 30% of women were convicted of violence. In fact, female inmates are more likely to be victims of violent crimes than to be the perpetrators. Four in 10 were physically or sexually abused before the age of 18 (LHC, 2004). Given this, it is not surprising that over two-thirds of women are classified as low risk (Level I or II) by the prison classification system (LHC, 2004).
While over half of the men in prison were incarcerated for violent crimes, just 30% of women were convicted of violence. In fact, female inmates are more likely to be victims of violent crimes than to be the perpetrators. Four in 10 were physically or sexually abused before the age of 18 (LHC, 2004). Given this, it is not surprising that over two-thirds of women are classified as low risk (Level I or II) by the prison classification system (LHC, 2004).
However, women often are held in more secure environments than their custody classifications would warrant. Approximately 4,500 low-level women offenders who are currently incarcerated could be eligible for placement in secure, community-based programs without risking community safety (National Council on Crime and delinquency (NCCD), 2006).
Background
Incarcerated women are not the only individuals negatively impacted by incarceration; families and communities have been devastated by women’s imprisonment. Approximately, 67% of incarcerated women are mothers (CRB, 2000) and many of them are single parents. NCCD estimates that in 2005 approximately 19,000 children had mothers who were incarcerated in California’s state facilities. Most of California’s incarcerated mothers are the primary caregivers of dependent children and hope to return home to their children. While the vast majority of children of incarcerated men continue to live with their mothers, children of incarcerated women are more likely to end up living with other relatives or in foster care (Powell & Nolan, 2003).
Incarcerated women are not the only individuals negatively impacted by incarceration; families and communities have been devastated by women’s imprisonment. Approximately, 67% of incarcerated women are mothers (CRB, 2000) and many of them are single parents. NCCD estimates that in 2005 approximately 19,000 children had mothers who were incarcerated in California’s state facilities. Most of California’s incarcerated mothers are the primary caregivers of dependent children and hope to return home to their children. While the vast majority of children of incarcerated men continue to live with their mothers, children of incarcerated women are more likely to end up living with other relatives or in foster care (Powell & Nolan, 2003).
Visitation policies and the distance to prisons make it difficult for children to visit. Seventy-nine percent of incarcerated mothers in California never receive a visit during their incarceration (Powell & Nolan, 2003). Separating mothers from children has a substantial impact on their futures. Children of inmates are much more likely than their peers to become incarcerated. Research suggests that mothers who are able to maintain a relationship with their children are less likely to return to prison (WPA, 2009). To break the cycle of incarceration, California must adopt policies that facilitate parenting and family reunification.
Solution
This bill authorizes the Secretary of CDCR to assign alternative custody arrangements to individuals on a voluntary basis that meet the following criteria:
Solution
This bill authorizes the Secretary of CDCR to assign alternative custody arrangements to individuals on a voluntary basis that meet the following criteria:
§ No current or prior convictions of a violent, serious or sex crime;
§ Determined by an assessment to be low risk; and
§ Women, pregnant inmates, and primary caregivers of dependent children.
Alternative Custody includes:
§ Confinement to a residential home.
§ Confinement to a residential drug or treatment program.
§ Confinement to a transitional care facility.
§ Use of electronic monitoring, GPS, or other supervising devices.
Benefits
§ Lowers recidivism rates
§ Lowers recidivism rates
§ Encourages community and family involvement
§ Fewer children in Child Welfare System
§ Reduces likelihood that inmate’s children will embark on a life of crime
Support
Chief Probation Officers, Little Hoover Commission, Fathers & Families, Commission on the Status of Women, Planned Parenthood, Crossroads Inc., Catholic Conference, Inc., CA Public Defenders, LA Dependency Lawyers, Friends Committee, Friends Outside, Attorneys for Criminal Justice, Drug Policy Alliance, Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety, CA Coalition for Women Prisoners, & Dawn Davison (former warden of CIW).
Chief Probation Officers, Little Hoover Commission, Fathers & Families, Commission on the Status of Women, Planned Parenthood, Crossroads Inc., Catholic Conference, Inc., CA Public Defenders, LA Dependency Lawyers, Friends Committee, Friends Outside, Attorneys for Criminal Justice, Drug Policy Alliance, Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety, CA Coalition for Women Prisoners, & Dawn Davison (former warden of CIW).
Opposition
Crime Victims United, CA District Attorneys Association
Crime Victims United, CA District Attorneys Association
I know that this bill is good for the family and keeping intact. We have to make sure that it is implemented correctly by getting more programs and housing for these parents that are permitted to vlunteer for this program. Maybe we can start to rebuild our familes and communities.
ReplyDeleteI am for SB 1266, it will break cycles, reunify families, and lower recidivism.
ReplyDeleteI am for this bill as well. We need to make sure that there is a way we can make sure that these kids are taken care of properly and not keeping getting tossed in the system like a bean bag. We need to help reunite families after they have been separate not keeping them apart.
ReplyDeleteI am for this bill as well. We need to make sure that there is a way we can make sure that these kids are taken care of properly and not keeping getting tossed in the system like a bean bag. We need to help reunite families after they have been separate not keeping them apart.
ReplyDeletethis bill is a good thing is will reunite families
ReplyDeleteIm also for SB1266 the kids should not have to sufer from being seperated from their parents i belive that we should help by haveing better programs this will increase the number rate of our childeren going to jail or into foster care.We need to take action our childeren will benefit from being with their parents, Not in jail. Are kids are our future.
ReplyDeleteI believe that children shoulod be with their parents and not separated. When you break up the family unity you are asking for trouble. With SB1266 the chance of keeping families together is sttronger.
ReplyDeleteThis is the most pragmatic solution to date dealing with the family breakdown via incaceration. Whatever happen to treatment before punishment.
ReplyDeleteWe need our families rebuilt not torn down. Hooray SB1266.
ReplyDeleteWhy has it taken so long to the light SB1266 is right on for keeping families together. Strong Family strong community
ReplyDeleteHas any implementation been done with this program. Can we really pull this off.
ReplyDeleteIts about time for something like this to happen I had my baby in the county jail and it was taken away from me because I had no people here to care for him. I only had six month to do. I would have qualified for SB 1266
ReplyDeleteI'm behind SB 1266, It's about, time justice is needed....
ReplyDeleteSB 1266 is a great plan to a healthy environment, where children reunite with their parents.
ReplyDeleteThere should always be alternatives to prisons rather than separating parents and children
ReplyDeleteIm glad fathers are included in this bill we are caretakes too.
ReplyDeletePlease help to save family
ReplyDeleteThis is a good bill. It will help keep the family unit intact instead of pulling it part where recividism is bound to happen for sure.
ReplyDeleteThat's right SB1266 abolish slavery again.
ReplyDeleteThis bill is only good if the parent is willing to work to reduce his/her chances of getting back into prison after they have served their time.
ReplyDeleteI needed this bill 5 years ago. my kids are in foster care
ReplyDeleteplease help to keep our children safe and health so let stop locking mother up in prison and find community program that will help these family with housing.
ReplyDeleteThanks to Time for Change foundation, who are our true advocate when it comes to women and children and the impact of incaceration. If you have not read invisable bars you should the truth is all there.
ReplyDeleteI am a grandmother that would love to see my daughter out of prison with a chance to rebuild her life and to be apart of her children life.
ReplyDeleteThis bill is good because the family unit is had to keep together when somebody is separtated in the family unit for a period of time. We are working to reunite prisoners who want to be reunited with their children and who are willing to try to keep the family unit intact after separation.
ReplyDeleteI like that this recognizes fathers as part of the family SB1266 shows love for fathers
ReplyDeleteAny law that will reduce incaceration and build up communities is good with me. Go SB1266
ReplyDeleteI am absolutely against this bill. Family is scared but this bill is not going to reunite the family that was once before the prison separation take place. This reunification is bascially rewarding the bad parent for committing low offense crimes.
ReplyDeleteStop talking about developing housing and job for the low income community and do something that would help not only these mother but the children thay are our future that mean yours too
ReplyDeleteI currently live in Inglewood, CA. I am against this bill as well. I believe a parent in the family that commits a crime no matter how serious it is should not have the right to try to reunified with their children after their term. We all want stable environments for our kids and this bill is treating kids like a sack of potatoes.
ReplyDeleteEvery once in a while there comes a champion for the poor and downtrodden. Keeping families together and whole should be the first priority of all nations.
ReplyDeleteI am so proud to be a supporter of this bill. I am one of those mothers who had a baby while incacerated. This goes a long way in saving so many of our children from foster care. Our families and communities will be much better for SB1266.
ReplyDeleteWhat is right is right....SB 1266 is right!
ReplyDeleteWe need SB 1266 to pass and better reabilitation programs along with it.
ReplyDelete