topnav

Home Issues & Campaigns Agency Members Community News Contact Us

Community News

Open dialogue among community members is an important part of successful advocacy. Take Action California believes that the more information and discussion we have about what's important to us, the more empowered we all are to make change.

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Immigration Reform Could Mean Windfall For Private Prisons

Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) detention center in Elizabeth, N.J., that the private prison contractor runs for the government, is seen Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2008. Inside, immigrants are detained indefinitely, some for months and years, while the government decides what to do with them. (Mel Evans/AP)
Members of Congress are in their home districts until later this fall, but that doesn’t mean they’re able to escape the issues on Capitol Hill.

Immigration reform is one of those issues following them back home. Advocacy groups and their opponents around the country are staging protests and events to highlight the issue.
But one potential side effect of immigration reform is getting overlooked: private prisons stand to make a lot of money.

Patrick O Connor, a reporter for the Wall Street Journal, tells Here & Now that the companies that run private prisons started benefiting as early as 2005, when changes were made in the way people were prosecuted, under a program called Operation Streamline.
The program shifted people into the federal system instead of going through the civil system, or simply being deported.

“A lot more people are in prison than had been before on immigration charges, and the companies are the direct beneficiaries of those policies,” O’Connor said.
Immigration reform, as it was passed by the Senate, would create another windfall for the two major private prison companies in the U.S., Corrections Corporation of America and the GEO Group.

While immigration reform would decriminalize the population inside the United States, border control would be strengthened.
Any legislation coming out of the House would likely call for even stronger border control than the Senate version.

via hereandnow.org

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

California budget proposal 'a gun to the head' of workers and the poor


It is time to fight back
As he unveiled his budget plan for California, Gov. Jerry Brown—the state’s top Democrat—said “some people might say I am putting a gun to their head.” He is right.

Just one week after taking the reigns as governor, Brown, launched a frontal assault on the state’s workers and poor. His budget for fiscal year 2011-2012 proposes $12.5 billion in cuts to surmount the $25.4 overall deficit, including the following deep cuts to fundamental health and social service programs. Brown’s plan would cut:
  • $1.7 billion from Medi-Cal. This program provides health care for the poorest, including people of color and children. 
  • $1.5 billion from the state’s welfare program, CalWORKS. This would throw roughly 115,000 poor families off the welfare rolls, cut benefits to foster children and end state subsidies for in-home domestic services for many blind, elderly and disabled people.
  • $750 million from services for the developmentally disabled, affecting nearly 250,000 people.
  • $580 million in cuts to state operations and employee compensation. That means an additional 8 to 10 percent pay cut for state employees, who have already endured furloughs and wage cuts. It is another dagger aimed at the heart of public employee unions.
  • $1 billion from California’s university systems. This is roughly 20 percent of the budget of both the University of California and California State University systems. It comes right after tuition has skyrocketed for students.
  • $400 million in cuts to community colleges. In addition, Brown would raise tuition fees from $26 to $36 per unit.
  • More cuts to child care, jobs programs and an elimination of adult day health centers that serve 27,000 low-income people.
What the budget does not cut is—cops and prisons. The budget proposes an increase in prison spending from $8.9 billion to $9.1 billion, including fully funding the salaries of state cops and paying for more overtime. It is no coincidence that the prison guards’ “union” was a top contributor to Brown’s campaign.

Those who will be affected by the budget know this is true: “This budget is a death warrant for California AIDS patients,” said the AIDS Healthcare Foundation in a statement.

Yet others, including Democratic politicians and some union representatives, have already accepted the cuts as a foregone conclusion. “I hate the cuts, but I am not going to reject the cuts,” said Senate President Pro-Tem Darrel Steinberg (D-Sacramento).

The past several California budgets have relied on massive cuts to social services for working-class people. Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger presided over them and rammed cuts through California’s legislature with bipartisan support, and only token resistance from the Democrats.

Now, the Democrats are presiding over “austerity measures” that could hurt California workers even more acutely. They intend to cut state general fund spending to its lowest level in nearly a decade, much lower than under the Schwarzenegger regime. There are several shallow “revenue” building measures trumpeted by Brown, but nothing major that goes after corporations that profit from our labor.

The message from the governor is clear: It is perfectly okay for poor people to starve, go without health care and lose wages, union representation and access to education. As long as there are more prisons to house the poor, in the government’s view, everything is okay.

That is the government’s view because that is the view of the ruling capitalist class, a class that cares nothing for workers and everything about making themselves richer and richer at our expense.

People’s needs, not profits
What could be done to fix California’s budget?

To fix the budget this year, the government should tax the rich. Cutting all corporate tax loopholes and raising taxes on Big Oil, banks and other massive corporations by 20 percent would do the trick. Those actions alone would raise tens of billions in revenue for the state.

The $9 billion prison budget should be slashed with the savings used to retain the social programs now on the chopping block. California does not need more repressive prisons. The money should go to fund jobs programs and make education and health care free for all, including undocumented workers and their families.

A moratorium should be declared on state interest payments to banks and other bondholders. People’s needs should take priority over bankers’ profits.

A long lasting fix would be to stop U.S. wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. The Pentagon spends $700 million each day waging war on workers’ abroad. Without the wars, the California state budget deficit would be overcome in just over a month. The deficits haunting nearly every U.S. state right now would go away in a matter of months.

All of this is possible. No cuts to social services are needed. California is the richest state in the world’s richest country. The wealth is there, it’s just not being used to meet the needs of the working class. Instead, corporate profits and wars are prioritized.

We can change the equation, but it is going to take a fight. And it is high time to fight. Brown’s budget proposal is a wake up call to organized labor, community organizations and all people who work for a living and struggle each day. The way to stop the cuts and reorient society to benefit the people, not the banks, is to build a movement that is strong, tireless, independent of the Democrats and Republicans—who will sell us out every time—and clear about our goals.

Working people cannot afford to wait around for next year’s cuts that will inevitably come.

Community Legislative Briefing

Community Legislative Briefing
Developing Champions to Restore the Golden State
Friday, August 23, 2013
10:00 - 12pm

ACLU - SC
1313 W. 8th St.
Los Angeles, CA 90017

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Support the California Homes and Jobs Act of 2013!

Campaign News
August 06, 2013
In just 6 days, the California Homes and Jobs Act will be heard by the first Assembly policy committee, with the second hearing scheduled only two days later.
  • Housing and Community Development: Monday, August 12 (1:30 p.m.) 
  • Labor and Employment: Wednesday, August 14 (1:30 p.m.) 
DAY 2 of Our 6 Days of Action 
Imagine a legislator who serves on the Assembly committees getting 200 letters one day, 100 phone calls two days later, and 300 tweets the day of the hearing, all asking for a YES vote for homes and jobs for Californians.  Call

Today's Action: CALL the members of the Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee. 
  • If you can make 3 calls, phone:
    • Cheryl Brown 916.319.2047
    • Brian Maienschein 916.319.2077
    • Beth Gaines 916.319.2006
  • What to Say: "Hi, my name is ________. [If calling on behalf of an organization . . .  I'm calling on behalf of __________.] I am a strong supporter of SB 391: The California Homes and Jobs Act. Our community desperately needs the jobs and affordable places to live that it will generate. I urge Assemblymember ________ to vote yes on SB 391 in housing committee on Monday."  
__________________________________________________________________
  • If you can make 6 calls, first phone the Assemblymembers above (using the script above), then phone the Assemblymembers below (using the script below):
    • Ed Chau: 916.319.2049
    • Toni Atkins 916.319.2078
    • Sharon Quirk-Silva 916.319.2065  
  • What to Say: Hi, my name is ________. [If calling on behalf of an organization, I'm calling on behalf of __________.] I am a strong supporter of SB 391: The California Homes and Jobs Act. I wanted to call and thank Assemblymember ________ for coauthoring SB 391 and let the Assemblymember know we appreciate his/her yes vote in housing committee on Monday."

Take credit for your work! 

Enter your name to let us know you made calls. 
What else can you do?
Forward this e-mail to your listservs/contacts. 


via: http://ow.ly/nH0Ce 

Friday, August 2, 2013

California prison's 'pay-to-stay' option offers 'quieter' rooms for $155 a day

Some prisoners at one California jail will now have the option to pay their way into a more comfortable stay, community news source the Argus reports.


The Fremont Police Department is now offering its inmates a "pay to stay" option. For a one-time fee of $45 plus $155 a night, prisoners serving short sentences on lesser charges can stay in a smaller facility while avoiding county jails.

"It's still a jail; there's no special treatment," Lt. Mark Devine, a Fremont police official who oversees the program, told Chris De Benedetti of the Argus. "They get the same cot, blanket and food as anybody in the county jail, except that our jail is smaller, quieter and away from the county jail population."

The program has been criticized by the American Civil Liberties Union as a "jail for the rich," KQED news reports. However, it's been defended by its creators as a way for the city of Fremont to earn some much-needed money. Devine told the Argus that the city stands to earn an annual profit of $244,000 if just 16 prisoners spend two nights per week in the "smaller, quieter" facility each year.

Three cities in the state of California have filed for bankruptcy during the last few years. Los Angeles could be two to three years away from bankruptcy as well, Daniel Pellissler, the president of California Pension Reform, a political organization dedicated to fixing California’s pension crisis, recently said.

Fremont is not the first city in California to experiment with a "pay to stay" inmate program. A dozen or so already existed in 2007 the state, according to a report by The New York Times. Although the programs have been around for quite some time, they started to receive negative attention after one jail in Fullerton, Calif., reportedly began offering phone and Internet access to an inmate.

California’s 33 adult prison facilities held 144,000 inmates in 2011, according to the Public Policy institute of California. The average cost to incarcerate an inmate in the state came in at about $47,000 per year during 2008 and 2009, according to California's non-partisan fiscal and policy adviser, the Legislative Analyst's Office. The Huffington Post

AN/ARA


via PressTV

Thursday, August 1, 2013

California infrastructure—the next California budget challenge?


Drive over the state’s bumpy roads, think about how old our bridges are, and take a look at the condition of your neighborhood school’s buildings. Try to get an internet connection while you’re at it.

What does all this have in common?

It’s all part of California's infrastructure—the vital, long-neglected backbone of the state’s economy, which many of us think has been overlooked for too long.

Infrastructure could very well be the state's next big budget challenge. To meet the needs of a growing population, California must invest more than $750 billion in public works over the next ten years.

The problem is the state doesn't have that kind of money.

Just so you know (and this will relieve many of you), we can't borrow our way out of this problem, it's too big. The state and local governments can't raise taxes enough to solve the problem either. After decade-long fiscal crisis that has forced the state to put off making long-term investments, California’s transportation infrastructure needs alone are estimated to top $500 billion over the next ten years.

This all sounds pretty policy wonky until you hit a pothole, or until your child's school needs repair or replacement or until a water main near your house breaks—or, yes, until you need a broadband connection to do business or check a baseball score.

We draw your attention to a really good story written by California Forward's Justin Ewers which ran on our sister website, caeconomy.org  this week. It offers some history about how we have approached building this state and shares some thoughtful ideas about what we ought to do next. Ewers highlights the findings of a new California Forward report that compiles the last 15 years’ of expert recommendations about how the state can develop a smart approach to infrastructure investments. We think it's worth a read.

By the way, Infrastructure has been identified as one of the seven signature initiatives for improving job creation and the state's ability to compete in a global marketplace by the California Economic Summit which will be held in Los Angeles on November 7-8. We didn't wave a wand and come up with these ideas. They emerged from sixteen regional meetings around the state, where local Californians shared their own ideas about the best ways to improve the economy.

And what was one constant theme from across California? We have to fix the state’s existing infrastructure. That means starting to figure out a way to pay for the next generation of investments in everything from our aging water system to the public transit projects that we need to get us to our jobs.

California Forward, along with our partners at the California Stewardship Network, have been leading this Summit effort for a couple of years now.

Our organization is aiming to be a catalyst for change in California, and we’ve targeted the creation of middle class jobs as one of our priorities. Why? Because creating jobs and improving the state's economy is job one in every public opinion poll that you read. More and better jobs can restore the California dream for the 21st century.

We’re working on a lot of other stuff too, but we'll save some of that for future posts.
Tell us what you think the top infrastructure needs are—and how (or whether) you are willing to pay for it!