by JAMES KILGORE
Since my CounterPunch
article last November which assessed the state of the
movement against mass incarceration, the rumblings of change in the criminal
justice have steadily grown louder. Attorney General Eric Holder has continued
to stream his mild-mannered critique by raising the issue of felony
disenfranchisement; the President has stepped forward with a proposal for
clemency for people with drug offenses that could free hundreds. In the media,
we’ve seen a scathing attack on
America’s addiction to punishment in the New York Times and
the American Academy of Sciences has released perhaps the most comprehensive
critique of mass incarceration to date, the 464 page The Growth of
Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. In
late May, several dozen conservatives including Newt Gingrich, Grover Norquist,
and former NRA President David Keene pulled together the first Right on Crime
(ROC) Leadership Summit in Washington DC.
The ROC, an organization which boasts
a coterie of members with impeccable right wing credentials, reiterated the
need for conservatives to drive the process of prison reform. The Conference
“call to action” argued: “In our earnest desire to have safer
neighborhoods, policy responses to crime have too often neglected core conservative
values — government accountability, personal responsibility, family
preservation, victim restoration, fiscal discipline, limited government and
free enterprise.” Gingrich engaged in similar kinds of soul searching:
“Once you decide everybody in prison is also an American then you gotta really
reach into your own heart and ask, is this the best we can do?”
All of this has precipitated
another round of optimistic cries about the possibilities of a Left-Right
Coalition on mass incarceration, including a high profile
Time Magazine op-ed co-authored by Norquist and MoveOn.org
co-founder Joan Blades.
While the spirit of
reconciliation in criminal justice attracts most of the media attention, a
number of pieces have also emerged rejecting any rush to positive judgment.
For example, fellows at the Brennan Center compiled a statistically
based report which contends that careral change has not yet
turned the corner while Black Agenda Report co-founderBruce Dixon
asserted that Obama’s clemency measures would have no
significant impact on mass incarceration.
However,
another process, likely at least as important in the long run as number
crunching, coalitions or clemency also has been gaining steam. The official
voices of incarceration- politicians, corrections officials, private prison
operators, prison guards unions and county sheriffs, are exploring changing
discourse and cosmetic reform in order to avoid systemic restructuring. In the
business world, they call this re-packaging.
Re-Packaging Mass
Incarceration: Carceral Humanism
Currently
this re-packaging assumes several forms. One of the most important is
carceral humanism or what some people refer to as incarceration lite.
Carceral humanism recasts the jailers as caring social service providers. The
cutting edge of carceral humanism is the field of mental health. According to a
recent report by the Treatment Advocacy Center, in 2012 the US had over 350,000
people with serious mental health issues in prisons and jails as compared to
just 35,000 in the remaining state mental health facilities. Prisons and
jails have become the new asylums and the jailers are waking up to the fact
that mental health facilities also represent a new cash cow. Likely the most
important examples of carceral humanism are happening in California. There
Governor Jerry Brown has played a shell game called realignment in which he’s
transferred thousands of people from state facilities to county jails in order
to comply with a Federal court order to reduce the state prison population. To
help counties adapt to all these new prisoners, the Governor put up $500
million to the state’s sheriffs to build extensions onto their jails. In
response, the Sheriffs had to come to Sacramento to pitch for a slice of that
money. They didn’t come talking about public safety. Their mantra focused on caring-providing
opportunities and improved circumstances for those in custody. The Department
of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s summary from Lake County, one of the 15
winners out of 36 submissions, is illustrative:
“$20 million for a new Type
II, 40-bed women’s jail with a new stand alone 39-bed Medical/Mental Health
Services building with program space, a new administration building, and
renovations so that existing space can accommodate programs.”
The
new jails are about institutionalizing the funding of mental health and other
services behind the walls, further diverting money from the already bare bones
social services in communities. The Lake County proposal also featured
another prominent strain of carceral humanism- a woman’s jail or in the present
corrections jargon, a “gender-responsive” facility. Since mainstream research
now argues that women experience incarceration differently than men, law
enforcement is waving the gender banner to access more funding for
construction. Los Angeles lies at the cutting edge in this regard. In
March the LA Board of Supervisors authorized $5.5 million for consultants to
draw up a plan for what some law enforcement people are calling a “women’s
village.” Deputy Sheriff Terri McDonald of Los Angeles suggested that the new
facility could be a place where “women and children could serve their time
together.”
Carceral humanism has also
surfaced in the repackaging of immigration detention centers. The latest
immigration prisons carry the label “civil detention” centers. The GEO Group,
the nation’s second largest private prison operator, opened their latest such
facility in Karnes Texas. TheLA Times called it a “pleasant
surprise for illegal immigrants.” Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
officials boast that people detained in Karnes won’t be housed in cells but in
“suites” holding eight people. Those detained will be supervised not by
guards or correctional officers but by “resident advisers.”
Repackaging 2:
Non-Alternative Alternatives to Incarceration
A
second form of repackaging mass incarceration falls under the heading of
non-alternative alternatives to incarceration. These non-alternatives purport
to change things but in essence simply perpetuate the culture of
punishment. The most common forms of these are Drug Courts, Mental Health
Courts and Day Reporting Centers. While many of these may be well-intentioned
and in some cases have positive effects, they typically involve heavy
monitoring of a person’s behavior including frequent drug testing, limitations
on movement and association, a whole range of involuntary but supposedly
therapeutic programs of dubious value and very little margin of error to
avoid reincarceration. Perhaps the most extreme example of a
non-alternative alternative to incarceration, and one which is likely to gain
increasing traction, is electronic monitoring.
While advocates claim
electronic monitoring facilitates employment, building family ties and
participation in community activities, my interviews with a number of people on
a monitor have revealed a different experience. Jean – Pierre
Shackelford, who spent two years on an ankle bracelet in Columbus, Ohio said
that he felt like his probation officer had him in a “choke hold” while he was
on an ankle bracelet. He labelled monitoring “another form of control and
slavery, 21st century electronic style.” Shaun Harris, on a
monitor for a year in Michigan called it a form of privatized incarceration,
“it’s like you just turned my family’s house into another cell” was his comment.
Shackelford and Harris, like many others I spoke with, both reported difficulty
getting movement for family activities and a lack of clarity about what was and
wasn’t permitted. Shackelford finally took to going to church because
that seemed to be the only activity his probation officer would approve.
Both Shackelford and Harris, like most people interviewed, complained that they
could be put on 24 hour “lockdown” (meaning they couldn’t leave the house at
all) for any reason for an indefinite period and there would be no way to
appeal such a decision. Even a late return home from work due to a delay
in public transportation could result in a re-arrest. To make matters worse,
most electronic monitors come with a daily user fee which ranges anywhere from five
to twenty dollars a day.
While
the punitive nature of ankle bracelet regimes is a cause for concern, the
potential to implement exclusion zones with GPS-based monitors contains more
serious long-term implications. Exclusion zones are places where monitors
are programmed not to let people go. At the moment authorities mainly use
exclusion zones to keep individuals with a sex offense history away from
schools and parks. But such zones have the potential to become new ways to
reconstruct the space of our cities, to keep the good people in and the bad
people out. This technology, which can be set up via smart phones, holds
the possibility to turn houses, buildings, even neighborhoods into
self-financing sites of incarceration. In the meantime, firms like the
GEO Group, which owns BI Incorporated, the nation’s largest provider of
electronic monitoring technology and backup services, are experimenting with
new target groups for ankle bracelets. In parts of California and Texas they’ve
used electronic monitors on kids with school truancy records. Under a $370
million contract, BI already has thousands of people awaiting immigration
adjudication on monitors. Packaged as an alternative these bracelets actually
represent a new horizon for incarceration, finding ways to do it cheaper with
technology through the private sector and then getting the user to pay, likely
a model that would line up squarely with Right on Crime’s notions of
reform..
Re-Packaging: Why Now?
Most
commentators attribute the spirit of change in criminal justice to a belated
recognition of the fundamental irrationality of spending so much money locking
up so many people for so long. As Grover Norquist put it, “Conservatives
may have wanted more incarceration than was necessary in the past, so what
we’re trying to do is find out about what works.”
Such
analyses make perfect sense but they also ignore a big picture political
question. Mass incarceration is becoming a flash point of rebellion and
resistance, with African American communities the most visible hot spot. Mass
incarceration and the racialized vagaries of criminal justice have been going
on for decades but recently we’ve seen new levels of anger and frustration in
reaction to the deaths of Trayvon Martin and Oscar Grant, as well as to the
sentencing of Marissa Alexander. Even mainstream Black commentators like
Melissa Harris-Perry appear incensed. At the grassroots level we’ve
witnessed campaigns against stop and frisk, solitary confinement, mandatory
minimums, crack cocaine laws and a host of new jails and prisons. On the
ideological plane, the notion of the New Jim Crow, categorizing mass
incarceration as a new form of slavery and segregation is catching on.
People are latching onto the idea of mass incarceration as a systemic problem
that can only be solved with a vast redirecting of resources into the
communities that have been devastated by imprisonment. In other words,
mass incarceration requires a total paradigm shift. The situation has the
potential to explode. Politicians and business people don’t like
explosions. When explosions appear a genuine possibility it is time to
talk reform, time to re-package.
To
make matters worse for purveyors of the carceral status quo, the immigrants’
rights movement has also been erupting over the last decade. From the immigrant
worker strikes and demonstrations of 2006 to the endless string of
demonstrations by the Dreamers and the Dream Defenders in the face of continued
mass deportations, a steady stream of unrest has materialized. With the
changing national demographics, key players in criminal justice need to be seen
to be doing something if they want to maintain their power.
Lastly,
there is the movement inside the prisons themselves. The hunger strikes
at Pelican Bay in California and in Washington’s Northwest Detention Center
coupled with the outpouring of solidarity these actions prompted, pose a
serious threat to the already heavily smeared image of US prisons. In addition,
even once notorious political prisoners are gaining increasing legitimacy.
Captives from across several generations are attracting large coteries of
supporters. This includes high profile individuals who have served
decades behind bars, individuals like Mumia Abu-Jamal, Albert Woodfox,
Oscar Lopez Rivera, Russell Maroon Shoatz and Leonard Peltier, along with more
contemporary prisoners like Lynne Stewart (recently released), Marie Mason and
Chelsea Manning. Inside and beyond the walls, there is rebellion in the air.
This
reality raises another question: whether a Left-Right Coalition can deliver
even enough change to calm the waters. Mass incarceration has become such a
fundamental part of how the US addresses issues of race, crime, poverty, gender
and inequality, it appears unlikely to collapse from gradual reforms whether
inspired by carceral humanism, punitive alternatives to incarceration or more
genuine critique. As with civil rights, pressure from below will be required,
from a social movement that has the creativity to envision an alternative, the
skills and legitimacy to mobilize the people who are most directly affected,
and the political power to make their voices be heard and get others to join
them. Perhaps this social movement is, to borrow a phrase from the Spanish poet
Antonio Machado, making the path by walking at this very moment.
James Kilgore is a Research Scholar
at the Center for African Studies at the University of Illinois
(Urbana-Champaign). He is a frequent commentator on mass incarceration, a
social justice activist, and the author of three novels, all of which were
written during his six and a half years of incarceration. He is currently
working on a primer on mass incarceration to be published by The New Press in
2015. He can be reached at waazn1@gmail.com
His writings are available at his website, www.freedomneverrests.com
via: http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/06/06/repackaging-mass-incarceration/
No comments:
Post a Comment