topnav

Home Issues & Campaigns Agency Members Community News Contact Us

Community News

Open dialogue among community members is an important part of successful advocacy. Take Action California believes that the more information and discussion we have about what's important to us, the more empowered we all are to make change.

Thursday, July 19, 2012

A good end to a rough year for California taxes

California ended the last fiscal year on a high note, raking in 5.6% more tax revenue than expected in June.

Income taxes were responsible for most of the boost, coming in at 8.4% above projections.

The details were released in a report from Gov. Jerry Brown's Department of Finance, and they show that revenue is outpacing revised estimates made in May and codified in the budget signed last month.

But that doesn't mean the last several months weren't financially difficult for California. When revenue is compared with expectations set when the 2011-12 budget was approved, taxes fell short by 4.8%, or $4.2 billion.

A dismal April, the most important month for income-tax collections, was responsible for a large chunk of that gap. That helped increase this year's budget deficit from $9.2 billion to an estimated $15.7 billion.

Brown says the budget he signed last month will cover that shortfall, but only if voters approve more than $8 billion in tax increases in November.


via LA Times

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Governor Signs High-Speed Rail Funding Bill

Law unlocks billions in funding for high-speed rail, Caltrain and BART. 
 
Governor Jerry Brown this morning signed the High-Speed Rail funding bill and will do so again this afternoon in San Francisco.

The bill, S.B. 1029, unlocks $4.7 billion in funding via the sale of state bonds approved by California voters 2008.  The funding will go in part to modernizing Caltrain and other regional transportation systems, and will be matched by a $7.9 billion investment from federal and local dollars.

“This legislation will help put thousands of people in California back to work,” said Governor Brown in a statement Wednesday. “By improving regional transportation systems, we are investing in the future of our state and making California a better place to live and work.”

Brown signed the legislation at Union Station in Los Angeles, and will have another ceremonial signing at the site of the new Transbay Terminal in San Francisco Wednesday afternoon. 
Both stations will serve as termini for the high-speed rail line.

The legislation authorizes $700 million in state funding for electrifying Caltrain by 2019, and will be matched with $2 billion in additional federal and local funding. This is on top of funding authorized for building a light rail connection in Southern California linking Metro transit to Union Station.
“I am very pleased the Governor has signed legislation authorizing the first leg of construction for California’s High Speed Rail Project,” said Speaker John A. PĂ©rez. “This ambitious project will create thousands of jobs and generate billions of dollars for our state, and my colleagues and I have been very pleased to work with the Governor to keep this project moving forward.”

“California’s transit system cannot stagnate because the facts are unforgiving: 20 million additional residents by 2050,” said Senate pro Tem Darrell Steinberg. “You can pave farmlands with new roads and blackout skies with airplanes but the air we breathe will be no better than a tailpipe. This project brings an infusion of energy into rural areas of high unemployment and provides relief for urban traffic gridlock. Most importantly, it’s an investment in California’s future.”

The initial segment of high-speed rail will begin construction in 2013 and link Merced to the San Fernando Valley. The California High-Speed Rail Authority and the Governor’s office claim this will create 100,000 job-years of employment in five years, equivalent to 20,000 full-time jobs annually, but those number are disputed by watchdog groups, including Palo Alto’s Californians Advocating Responsible Rail Design.

SB 1029 also includes money for replacing train cars on BART and implementing Positive Train Control, an automated system for controlling trains designed to stop collisions.

The total investment in Northern California transportation projects unlocked by SB 1029 totals $3.6 billion, according to the Governor’s office. Southern California will get $2.8 billion, and the Central Valley will get $6 billion.

The legislation also ratchets up the reporting requirements on the High-Speed Rail Authority, a move designed to boost accountability, manage project risks, and keep construction on schedule and within budget.

Friday, July 13, 2012

As Schools Fight Obesity, Physical Education Is Cut

More than a half-century ago, President Dwight D. Eisenhower formed the President’s Council on Youth Fitness, and today Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and Michelle Obama are among those making childhood obesity a public cause. But even as virtually every state has undertaken significant school reforms, many American students are being granted little or no time in the gym.  

In its biennial survey of high school students across the nation, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in June that nearly half said they had no physical education classes in an average week. In New York City, that number was 20.5 percent, compared with 14.4 percent a decade earlier, according to the C.D.C. 

That echoed findings by New York City’s comptroller, in October, of inadequate physical education at each of the elementary schools that auditors visited. Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, found just 20 percent of elementary schools in San Francisco’s system were meeting the state’s requirements: 20 minutes per day.

At Anatola Elementary School in Van Nuys, Calif., not only are there no gym teachers, but there is also no gym. The principal, Miriam King, has relied on $15-an-hour aides to oversee once-weekly exercise regimens for her 450 students at an outside playground. 

“Sometimes, when it is raining, we just cancel,” Ms. King said. 

In the Miami-Dade School District in Florida, physical education classes for middle school students were threatened by state legislation last year, in the face of anemic local tax collections and dropping property values. But the district’s top health educator, Jayne D. Greenberg, watched in thankful relief as a grass-roots effort mounted enough political pressure to beat back the proposed cuts. 

Still, Dr. Greenberg said, she has had to “double up some of the elementary physical education classes.” 

In East Harlem, at TAG Young Scholars, an elementary and middle school for gifted students, there was no gym teacher for elementary students, according to Patricia Saydah, whose son Mitchell Deutsch just finished the first grade there. Art teachers and guidance counselors oversaw the classes, and students were sometimes called on to demonstrate stretching, Mitchell said. Next year threatens more hardship: One of the four schools that share TAG’s building is expanding, further straining the sole gym. 

Ms. Saydah said she was concerned with Mitchell’s ability to focus in class without physical activity most days. 

“He comes out of school and he is bouncing off the walls,” she said. 

Senator Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, has proposed injecting language into the federal budget creating incentives for schools to report how much physical activity students are getting. He also asked the Government Accountability Office to look into the issue and, in February, it released a survey showing that while schools appeared more aware of the benefits of physical education, “they have reduced the amount of time spent” on such classes. 

Principals most frequently blame budget cuts, and in New York, they also cite pressures to devote resources to test preparation, and what one union leader called a lack of interest from the department headquarters. 

“There does not appear to be a promotion, or support, from the Department of Education for daily physical education in many of our high schools,” said Jeff Engel, a vice principal at Long Island City High School, in Queens, who is a member of the executive board of the principals’ union. He said that his own school provided daily physical education, but that many did not. “We have a huge obesity epidemic in the city, yet we see many of our high schools going to nondaily physical education.” 

According to the city comptroller’s audit, none of the 31 elementary schools that auditors visited were holding physical education classes as frequently as required: every day for kindergarten through third grade and three times a week for grades four through six, for a minimum of 120 minutes weekly; and at least 90 minutes a week for grades seven and eight. In grades 7 through 12, state guidelines call for physical education three times a week in one semester and twice a week in another. 

Kathleen Grimm, New York City’s deputy schools chancellor for operations, said the Bloomberg administration required adequate physical education in schools, but acknowledged it had work to do. Since principals face challenges in providing space and time for those classes, she said, the administration hoped to put a plan in place by summer’s end to provide them “better support” across all areas of education, including physical education. 

The department has not filed an overall physical education plan with the state since 1982, though state officials recommend a new one every seven years. A spokeswoman for the city schools says one will be presented in September. 

Besides its value in fighting obesity, physical education has also been linked in some studies to good academic outcomes. Dr. John J. Ratey, a Harvard professor and author of “Spark: The Revolutionary New Science of Exercise and the Brain” cited a 2010 study on the topic from the federal Health and Human Services Department. 

“There is shrinking P.E. and recess time for our kids,” Dr. Ratey wrote. “P.E. teachers are fighting like cats and dogs to hold the line on their jobs and worth, at the same time as there is a dawning awareness that we have missed the boat.” 

Despite the shortcomings in physical education, Mr. Bloomberg has received high marks from public health advocates for his anti-obesity policies, including calorie disclosures in chain restaurants, a proposed ban on large sugary drinks in certain settings, and limits on the calorie and sugar contents of food sold in school vending machines. 

In the meantime, the city has promoted several school health initiatives, including 10-minute “fitness breaks” in classrooms and before- and after-school recreation for middle school students. And Ms. Grimm said that the city had been honored, nationally, for a program to assess students’ fitness and that 850,000 pupils had completed the program this year. In December, the city said that annual fitness exams given to most of the city’s kindergarten though eighth-grade students showed a 5.5 percent drop in the number of obese schoolchildren, the biggest decline reported by any large city. The exams showed 21 percent of children were obese, down from 22 percent. 

One elementary school making an effort is Sheridan Academy for Young Leaders, in the Bronx, where Ronny Rodriguez, a physical education instructor, ran 12 students through a rigorous 50-minute class one Friday last month. 

Each student gets class once a week, far short of state requirements. During fitness breaks, students in science class stand and clap to the beat of a heart, and in social studies, they move as if navigating a rain forest

Still, Mr. Rodriguez and Vicki Weiner, co-chairwoman of the school’s wellness program, wish more days had physical education. 

As his perspiring first graders, some visibly overweight, poured out of the gym for the last time, Mr. Rodriguez addressed his “young leaders” and asked what they would do over the summer. 

“Exercise!” came the choral reply. 

“One day, or every day?” he asked. They replied, in unison: “Every day!” 

Vivian Yee contributed reporting.

via NYTimes.com

Thursday, July 12, 2012

Unions make a move to help CA with budget deficit

California smallA tax limitation organization says California unions may be finally waking up to reality by agreeing to a year of furloughs.

California's largest state workers union has agreed to continue a year of furloughs and will see an almost five-percent cut in pay and hours. The Service Employees International Union Local 1000 said that 66 percent of members agreed to take 12 unpaid days. The agreement follows a proposal by Governor Jerry Brown to cut the state to a four-day workweek.

Lew Uhler, founder of the National Tax Limitation Committee, discusses the unions' response to the state's budget deficit.

"They're at least beginning to recognize reality in making concessions, although simply taking a day off without pay is not a particularly significant concession," he remarks.

The agreement comes in the midst of pressure for employee unions to make cuts to pay and benefits in light of California's budget deficit.

"There is little tolerance for any complaints from public servants who are paid more on average than private sector workers," Uhler says.

Under the agreement, employees will have some say over when they will take their unpaid days.

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

California's budget plan balanced with risky assumptions

SACRAMENTO — Gov. Jerry Brown has bet a portion of California's financial health on the expectation that a hyperpartisan Congress will change course on a hotly debated tax policy this year.

The budget Brown signed last week assumes that over the next four years the state will reap almost $2.3 billion from the federal estate tax, a levy on wealth inheritance. California hasn't collected any revenue from the tax since 2004, and if Congress sticks with current policy it won't in the coming years, either.
 
"It seems most likely the state will see no such revenues," said Jason Sisney, a deputy at the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office, which advises lawmakers on financial matters. A report from that office last fall warned that California should not anticipate otherwise.

The Brown administration estimates a relatively small amount of revenue, $45 million, in the budget year that began this week. But by the 2015-16 fiscal year, officials are counting on $1.2 billion. That assumption has helped Brown and Democratic lawmakers insist that California will emerge from its financial turmoil with a budget surplus three years from now.

"I believe that if we continue on this path, this era of unending deficits will be behind us," Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) told reporters after the Legislature finalized its budget bills last week.

But the bet on estate taxes is one of several risky ones they made this year, not the least of which is the expectation that voters will approve more than $8 billion in higher taxes in November. Another assumption is already faltering: Facebook stock is trading at lower levels than expected, casting doubt on hopes that the company's initial public offering would generate $1.9 billion in tax receipts.

In addition, the analyst's office said the state may collect $900 million less than anticipated from defunct local redevelopment agencies.

If the forecasts don't pan out, state leaders could be scrambling to keep their heads above water, said Christopher Thornberg, a financial consultant who advises the state controller. That's what happened earlier this year when tax revenue fell $3.5 billion short, widening the budget deficit to $15.7 billion.
"There's all sorts of uncertainty," he said.

Administration officials acknowledged in January that the estate-tax money was unlikely to materialize. The governor's January budget proposal said there was "only a narrow range of federal law under which California would receive any revenue" from the levy.
State Sen. Bill Emmerson (R-Hemet), who sits on the Senate's budget committee, suggested the new spending plan would more likely result in a deficit than a surplus.

"The governor and legislative Democrats are desperate to claim they have solved the budget problem," Emmerson said in a statement. "It is a shame they cannot be honest with the people of California."

H.D. Palmer, a spokesman for Brown's Department of Finance, said it's not that simple. If the state pulls in less revenue, it won't be required to spend as much on public schools under California's voter-approved funding formula. That would ease the burden on the budget.

Palmer said the administration included the estate tax money because the existing federal policy, passed in 2001 under PresidentGeorge W. Bush, is set to expire at the end of the year. That would allow the state to start collecting those funds again.

But the analyst's office said in a report last November: "Most observers believe that, no matter what Congress does to the estate tax in 2012," California won't be able to collect money from it. The report cautioned lawmakers not to incorporate any such revenue into the budget "unless there is a clear indication from Congress" that it will be available.
That indication hasn't come. President Obama did not propose that states receive estate-tax revenue in his most recent federal budget plan, according to the U.S. Treasury.

"It's very hard to bring a tax back that's been gone for several years," said Tracy Gordon, who studies state and local finances at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank.
chris.megerian@latimes.com
 



Report: Too little mental health care for seniors

WASHINGTON (AP) — Getting older does not just mean a risk for physical ailments like heart disease and creaky knees: A new report finds as many as 1 in 5 American seniors has a mental health or substance abuse problem.

And as the population rapidly ages over the next two decades, millions of baby boomers may have a hard time finding care and services for mental health problems such as depression — because the nation is woefully lacking in doctors, nurses and other health workers trained for their special needs, the Institute of Medicine said Tuesday.

Instead, the country is focused mostly on preparing for the physical health needs of what has been called the silver tsunami.

"The burden of mental illness and substance abuse disorders in older adults in the United States borders on a crisis," wrote Dr. Dan Blazer of Duke University, who chaired the Institute of Medicine panel that investigated the issue. "Yet this crisis is largely hidden from the public and many of those who develop policy and programs to care for older people."

Already, at least 5.6 million to 8 million Americans age 65 and older have a mental health condition or substance abuse disorder, the report found — calling that a conservative estimate that does not include a number of disorders. Depressive disorders and psychiatric symptoms related to dementia are the most common.

While the panel could not make precise projections, those numbers are sure to grow as the number of seniors nearly doubles by 2030, said report co-author Dr. Peter Rabins, a psychiatrist at Johns Hopkins University. How much substance abuse treatment for seniors will be needed is a particular question, as rates of illegal drug use are higher in people currently in their 50s than in previous generations.

Mental health experts welcomed the report.

"This is a wake-up call for many reasons," said Dr. Ken Duckworth of the National Alliance on Mental Illness. The coming need for geriatric mental health care "is quite profound for us as a nation, and something we need to attend to urgently," he said.

Merely getting older does not make mental health problems more likely to occur, Rabins said, noting that middle age is the most common time for onset of depression.

But when they do occur in older adults, the report found that they are too often overlooked and tend to be more complex. Among the reasons:

—People over 65 almost always have physical health problems at the same time that can mask or distract from the mental health needs. The physical illnesses, and medications used for them, also can complicate treatment. For example, up to a third of people who require long-term steroid treatment develop mood problems that may require someone knowledgeable about both the medical and mental health issues to determine whether it is best to cut back the steroids or add an antidepressant, Rabins said.

On the other side, older adults with untreated depression are less likely to have their diabetes, high blood pressure and other physical conditions under control — and consequently wind up costing a lot more to treat.

—Age alters how people's bodies metabolize alcohol and drugs, including prescription drugs. That can increase the risk of dangerous overdoses, and worsen or even trigger substance abuse problems.

—Grief is common in old age as spouses, other relatives and friends die. It may be difficult to distinguish between grief and major depression.

That also means a loss of the support systems that earlier in life could have helped people better recover from a mental health problem, said Dr. Paul D.S. Kirwin, president of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. Adding stress may be loss of a professional identity with retirement, and the role reversal that happens when children start taking care of older parents.

"There'll never be enough geriatric psychiatrists or geriatric medicine specialists to take care of this huge wave of people that are aging," Kirwin said.

The Institute of Medicine report recognizes that. It says all health workers who see older patients — including primary care physicians, nurses, physicians' assistants and social workers — need some training to recognize the signs of geriatric mental health problems and provide at least basic care. To get there, it called for changes in how Medicare and Medicaid pay for mental health services, stricter licensing requirements for health workers, and for the government to fund appropriate training programs.

Monday, July 9, 2012

Please sign on: Opposition to Nutrition Cuts in House Farm bill

With the announcement earlier today that the initial version of House Farm Bill includes $16 billion in cuts to SNAP/CalFresh, it’s important that we send a strong and unified message to our California Agriculture Committee Members in opposition to those cuts. The Senate has already passed a bill that includes $4.5 billion in cuts to SNAP. 

We are working with local food banks to get local organizations that are in the districts of California’s three Congressmen who serve on Agriculture Committee to sign a letter (letters attached) asking the Congressmen to oppose cuts to SNAP/CalFresh in the Farm Bill.  We are also asking statewide organizations to sign all three letters – they’re identical except who they’re addressed to.  The deadline to sign your organizations onto the letter(s) has been extended to Monday, July 9.  If you have local partners, members or affiliates in any of the three congressional districts who would be interested in signing the letter, I would very much appreciate you passing this along.  Below I’ve listed the three Congressmen and the counties that make up their congressional districts.  I’ve also outlined the steps that you can take to get signatures and provided a template for an email you can send to local partners.  Thanks in advance for your help!

1.       If you’re a statewide organization, sign onto all three letters by emailing me and letting me know you would like to sign.  Please provide me with the correct spelling of the name of your organization.

2.       Send a request to local organizations in each of the three congressional districts to sign the letter to their relevant Congressman.  Below is a list of the three California Congressmen who serve on the Agriculture Committee and all the counties they represent.  There is also a template for an email you can send to local partners.

California Congressmen on Agriculture Committee and the Counties they Represent (some partially)
Congressman Dennis Cardoza - Merced, Stanislaus, San Joaquin, Madera
Congressman Jim Costa - Fresno, Kings, Kern
Congressman Joe Baca - San Bernardino

Template Email to Local Organizations
Sign your Organization on to a Letter to Costa/Cardoza/Baca to Prevent SNAP/CalFresh Cuts

Sign your organization on to the attached letter to Congressman Costa/Cardoza/Baca  asking him to oppose cuts to SNAP/CalFresh or any other nutrition programs.  The Chairman of House Committee on Agriculture has just introduced a Farm Bill with devastating cuts to SNAP/CalFresh.  The bill includes $16 billion in cuts to SNAP over ten years.  The Congressman is a member of the Agriculture Committee and will be in a unique position to oppose those cuts.

Please take a moment to sign your organization on as a supporter of the attached letter.  The deadline to sign is this Monday, July 9.  To sign your organization onto the letter, just email Eric Manke at eric@cafoodbanks.org and let me know that your organization would like to be listed as a signer of the Costa/Cardoza/Baca Farm Bill letter.  Please provide Eric with your name and the correct spelling of the name of your organization.  

Download below: